VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Florian Richer
dblp:208/1435
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 77% Wearable and physiological sensing · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
feedback control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A closed-loop and ergonomic control for prosthetic wrist rotation · ICRA 2020 |
Human-robot interaction › physical human-robot interaction
prosthetic control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A closed-loop and ergonomic control for prosthetic wrist rotation · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
compensatory movement measurement · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | A closed-loop and ergonomic control for prosthetic wrist rotationabstractBeyond the ultimate goal of prosthetics, repairing all the capabilities of amputees, the development line of upper-limb prostheses control mainly relies on three aspects: the robustness, the intuitiveness and the reduction of mental fatigue. Many complex structures and algorithms are proposed but no one question a common open-loop nature, where the user is the one in charge of correcting errors. Yet, closing the control loop at the prosthetic level may help to improve the three main lines of research cited above. One major issue to build a closed-loop control is the definition of a reliable error signal; this paper proposes to use body compensations, naturally exhibited by prostheses users when the motion of their device is inaccurate, as such. The described control scheme measures these compensatory movements and makes the prosthesis move in order to bring back the user into an ergonomic posture. The function of the prosthesis is no longer to perform a given motion but rather to correct the posture of its user while s/he focus on performing an endpoint task. This concept was validated and compared to a standard open-loop scheme, for the control of a prosthetic wrist, with five healthy subjects completing a dedicated task with a customized transradial prosthesis. Results show that the presented closed-loop control allows for more intuitiveness and less mental burden without enhancing body compensation. Mathilde Legrand, Nathanaël Jarrassé, Florian Richer, Guillaume Morel |
ICRA | 3 |