This paper investigates how smartphone users perceive switching from their primary authentication mechanism to a fallback one, based on the context. This is useful in cases where the primary mechanism fails (e.g., wet fingers when using fingerprint). While prior work introduced the concept, we are the first to investigate its perception by users and their willingness to follow a system's suggestion for a switch. We present findings from a two-week field study (N=29) using an Android app, showing that users are willing to adopt alternative mechanisms when prompted. We discuss how context-awareness can improve the perception of authentication reliability and potentially improve usability and security.

Entering text passwords on mobile devices is a significant challenge. Current systems either display passwords in plain text: making them visible to bystanders, or replace characters with asterisks shortly after they are typed: making editing them harder. This work presents a novel approach to mask text passwords by distorting them using graphical filters. Distorted passwords are difficult to observe by attackers because they cannot mentally reverse the distortions. Yet passwords remain readable by their owners because humans can recognize visually distorted versions of content they saw before. We present results of an online questionnaire and a user study where we compared Color-halftone, Crystallize, Blurring, and Mosaic filters to Plain text and Asterisks when 1) entering, 2) editing, and 3) shoulder surfing one-word passwords, random character passwords, and passphrases. Rigorous analysis shows that Color-halftone and Crystallize filters significantly improve editing speed, editing accuracy and observation resistance compared to current approaches.