VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ori Ernst
dblp:217/3552
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 80% Information extraction and text analysis · 20% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
1.8 | 3 | 2023 | OpenAsp: A Benchmark for Multi-document Open Aspect-based Summarization · EMNLP 2023 How "Multi" is Multi-Document Summarization? · EMNLP 2022 Controlled Text Reduction · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
multi-document summarization |
0.9 | 3 | 2023 | How "Multi" is Multi-Document Summarization? · EMNLP 2022 OpenAsp: A Benchmark for Multi-document Open Aspect-based Summarization · EMNLP 2023 QA-Align: Representing Cross-Text Content Overlap by Aligning Question-Answer Propositions · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › opinion summarization
aspect-based summarization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | OpenAsp: A Benchmark for Multi-document Open Aspect-based Summarization · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
content selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Controlled Text Reduction · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
question-answer driven semantic role labeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | QA-Align: Representing Cross-Text Content Overlap by Aligning Question-Answer Propositions · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised learning · 1.1summary-source alignment · 1.1annotation protocol · 0.7crowd annotation · 0.5QA-based alignment modeling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | OpenAsp: A Benchmark for Multi-document Open Aspect-based SummarizationabstractThe performance of automatic summarization models has improved dramatically in recent years.Yet, there is still a gap in meeting specific information needs of users in real-world scenarios, particularly when a targeted summary is sought, such as in the useful aspectbased summarization setting targeted in this paper.Previous datasets and studies for this setting have predominantly concentrated on a limited set of pre-defined aspects, focused solely on single document inputs, or relied on synthetic data.To advance research on more realistic scenarios, we introduce OPENASP, a benchmark for multi-document open aspect-based summarization.This benchmark is created using a novel and cost-effective annotation protocol, by which an open aspect dataset is derived from existing generic multi-document summarization datasets.We analyze the properties of OPENASP showcasing its high-quality content.Further, we show that the realistic open-aspect setting realized in OPENASP poses a challenge for current state-of-the-art summarization models, as well as for large language models. Shmuel Amar, Liat Schiff, Ori Ernst, Asi Shefer, Ori Shapira, Ido Dagan |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2022 | Controlled Text ReductionabstractProducing a reduced version of a source text, as in generic or focused summarization, inherently involves two distinct subtasks: deciding on targeted content and generating a coherent text conveying it.While some popular approaches address summarization as a single end-to-end task, prominent works support decomposed modeling for individual subtasks.Further, semi-automated text reduction is also very appealing, where users may identify targeted content while models would generate a corresponding coherent summary.In this paper, we focus on the second subtask, of generating coherent text given pre-selected content.Concretely, we formalize Controlled Text Reduction as a standalone task, whose input is a source text with marked spans of targeted content ("highlighting").A model then needs to generate a coherent text that includes all and only the target information.We advocate the potential of such models, both for modular fully-automatic summarization, as well as for semi-automated human-in-the-loop use cases.Facilitating proper research, we crowdsource high-quality dev and test datasets for the task.Further, we automatically generate a larger "silver" training dataset from available summarization benchmarks, leveraging a pretrained summary-source alignment model.Finally, employing these datasets, we present a supervised baseline model, showing promising results and insightful analyses.1 Aviv Slobodkin, Paul Roit, Eran Hirsch, Ori Ernst, Ido Dagan |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2022 | How "Multi" is Multi-Document Summarization?abstractThe task of multi-document summarization (MDS) aims at models that, given multiple documents as input, are able to generate a summary that combines disperse information, originally spread across these documents.Accordingly, it is expected that both reference summaries in MDS datasets, as well as system summaries, would indeed be based on such dispersed information.In this paper, we argue for quantifying and assessing this expectation.To that end, we propose an automated measure for evaluating the degree to which a summary is "disperse", in the sense of the number of source documents needed to cover its content.We apply our measure to empirically analyze several popular MDS datasets, with respect to their reference summaries, as well as the output of state-of-the-art systems.Our results show that certain MDS datasets barely require combining information from multiple documents, where a single document often covers the full summary content.Overall, we advocate using our metric for assessing and improving the degree to which summarization datasets require combining multi-document information, and similarly how summarization models actually meet this challenge.1 Ruben Wolhandler, Arie Cattan, Ori Ernst, Ido Dagan |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2022 | Proposition-Level Clustering for Multi-Document SummarizationabstractOri Ernst, Avi Caciularu, Ori Shapira, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Mohit Bansal, Jacob Goldberger, Ido Dagan. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Ori Ernst, Avi Caciularu, Ori Shapira, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Mohit Bansal, Jacob Goldberger, Ido Dagan |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2022 | Extending Multi-Text Sentence Fusion Resources via Pyramid AnnotationsabstractDaniela Brook Weiss, Paul Roit, Ori Ernst, Ido Dagan. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Daniela Brook Weiss, Paul Roit, Ori Ernst, Ido Dagan |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2021 | Summary-Source Proposition-level Alignment: Task, Datasets and Supervised BaselineabstractAligning sentences in a reference summary with their counterparts in source documents was shown as a useful auxiliary summarization task, notably for generating training data for salience detection.Despite its assessed utility, the alignment step was mostly approached with heuristic unsupervised methods, typically ROUGE-based, and was never independently optimized or evaluated.In this paper, we propose establishing summary-source alignment as an explicit task, while introducing two major novelties: (1) applying it at the more accurate proposition span level, and (2) approaching it as a supervised classification task.To that end, we created a novel training dataset for proposition-level alignment, derived automatically from available summarization evaluation data.In addition, we crowdsourced dev and test datasets, enabling model development and proper evaluation.Utilizing these data, we present a supervised proposition alignment baseline model, showing improved alignmentquality over the unsupervised approach. Ori Ernst, Ori Shapira, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Michael Lepioshkin, Jacob Goldberger, Mohit Bansal, Ido Dagan |
CoNLL | 1 |
| 2021 | QA-Align: Representing Cross-Text Content Overlap by Aligning Question-Answer PropositionsabstractMulti-text applications, such as multidocument summarization, are typically required to model redundancies across related texts.Current methods confronting consolidation struggle to fuse overlapping information.In order to explicitly represent content overlap, we propose to align predicate-argument relations across texts, providing a potential scaffold for information consolidation.We go beyond clustering coreferring mentions, and instead model overlap with respect to redundancy at a propositional level, rather than merely detecting shared referents.Our setting exploits QA-SRL, utilizing question-answer pairs to capture predicate-argument relations, facilitating laymen annotation of cross-text alignments.We employ crowd-workers for constructing a dataset of QA-based alignments, and present a baseline QA alignment model trained over our dataset.Analyses show that our new task is semantically challenging, capturing content overlap beyond lexical similarity and complements cross-document coreference with proposition-level links, offering potential use for downstream tasks. Daniela Brook Weiss, Paul Roit, Ayal Klein, Ori Ernst, Ido Dagan |
EMNLP (1) | 4 |