Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michelle M. Ng

dblp:217/9497 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-4125-5224ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing
0.312018
CommunityCrit: Inviting the Public to Improve and Evaluate Urban Design Ideas through Micro-Activities · CHI 2018
Collaborative and social computing › civic engagement
public participation
0.312018
CommunityCrit: Inviting the Public to Improve and Evaluate Urban Design Ideas through Micro-Activities · CHI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

observation · 0.3deployment study · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 CommunityCrit: Inviting the Public to Improve and Evaluate Urban Design Ideas through Micro-Activities
abstract
While urban design affects the public, most people do not have the time or expertise to participate in the process. Many online tools solicit public input, yet typically limit interaction to collecting complaints or early-stage ideas. This paper explores how to engage the public in more complex stages of urban design without requiring a significant time commitment. After observing workshops, we designed a system called CommunityCrit that offers micro-activities to engage communities in elaborating and evaluating urban design ideas. Through a four-week deployment, in partnership with a local planning group seeking to redesign a street intersection, CommunityCrit yielded 352 contributions (around 10 minutes per participant). The planning group reported that CommunityCrit provided insights on public perspectives and raised awareness for their project, but noted the importance of setting expectations for the process. People appreciated that the system provided a window into the planning process, empowered them to contribute, and supported diverse levels of skills and availability.
Narges Mahyar, Michelle M. Ng, Reginald A. Wu, Steven Dow
CHI3