Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kwang Joon Kim
dblp:220/5298
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 26% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Cost-Effective Interactive Attention Learning with Neural Attention Processes · ICML 2020 Uncertainty-Aware Attention for Reliable Interpretation and Prediction · NeurIPS 2018 |
Medical and health informatics
electronic health records |
0.5 | 2 | 2020 | Deep Mixed Effect Model Using Gaussian Processes: A Personalized and Reliable Prediction for Healthcare · AAAI 2020 Uncertainty-Aware Attention for Reliable Interpretation and Prediction · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Cost-Effective Interactive Attention Learning with Neural Attention Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Mixed Effect Model Using Gaussian Processes: A Personalized and Reliable Prediction for Healthcare · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing data imputation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Why Not to Use Zero Imputation? Correcting Sparsity Bias in Training Neural Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
mixed-effects model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Mixed Effect Model Using Gaussian Processes: A Personalized and Reliable Prediction for Healthcare · AAAI 2020 |
Human-AI interaction
interactive machine learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Cost-Effective Interactive Attention Learning with Neural Attention Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Uncertainty-Aware Attention for Reliable Interpretation and Prediction · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Mixed Effect Model Using Gaussian Processes: A Personalized and Reliable Prediction for Healthcare · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Mixed Effect Model Using Gaussian Processes: A Personalized and Reliable Prediction for Healthcare · AAAI 2020 |
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction
risk prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Uncertainty-Aware Attention for Reliable Interpretation and Prediction · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sample-efficient attention · 0.9neural attention process · 0.9mixed-effect model · 0.9gaussian process · 0.9deep neural network · 0.9variational inference · 0.7uncertainty-aware attention · 0.7reranking · 0.4re-ranking · 0.4neural network training · 0.4imputation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Deep Mixed Effect Model Using Gaussian Processes: A Personalized and Reliable Prediction for HealthcareabstractWe present a personalized and reliable prediction model for healthcare, which can provide individually tailored medical services such as diagnosis, disease treatment, and prevention. Our proposed framework targets at making personalized and reliable predictions from time-series data, such as Electronic Health Records (EHR), by modeling two complementary components: i) a shared component that captures global trend across diverse patients and ii) a patient-specific component that models idiosyncratic variability for each patient. To this end, we propose a composite model of a deep neural network to learn complex global trends from the large number of patients, and Gaussian Processes (GP) to probabilistically model individual time-series given relatively small number of visits per patient. We evaluate our model on diverse and heterogeneous tasks from EHR datasets and show practical advantages over standard time-series deep models such as pure Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Ingyo Chung, Saehoon Kim, Juho Lee 0001, Kwang Joon Kim, Sung Ju Hwang, Eunho Yang |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2020 | Why Not to Use Zero Imputation? Correcting Sparsity Bias in Training Neural Networks
Joonyoung Yi, Juhyuk Lee, Kwang Joon Kim, Sung Ju Hwang, Eunho Yang |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2020 | Cost-Effective Interactive Attention Learning with Neural Attention ProcessesabstractWe propose a novel interactive learning framework which we refer to as Interactive Attention Learning (IAL), in which the human supervisors interactively manipulate the allocated attentions, to correct the model’s behaviour by updating the attention-generating network. However, such a model is prone to overfitting due to scarcity of human annotations, and requires costly retraining. Moreover, it is almost infeasible for the human annotators to examine attentions on tons of instances and features. We tackle these challenges by proposing a sample-efficient attention mechanism and a cost-effective reranking algorithm for instances and features. First, we propose Neural Attention Processes (NAP), which is an attention generator that can update its behaviour by incorporating new attention-level supervisions without any retraining. Secondly, we propose an algorithm which prioritizes the instances and the features by their negative impacts, such that the model can yield large improvements with minimal human feedback. We validate IAL on various time-series datasets from multiple domains (healthcare, real-estate, and computer vision) on which it significantly outperforms baselines with conventional attention mechanisms, or without cost-effective reranking, with substantially less retraining and human-model interaction cost. Jay Heo, Junhyeon Park, Hyewon Jeong, Kwang Joon Kim, Juho Lee 0001, Eunho Yang, Sung Ju Hwang |
ICML | 4 |
| 2018 | Uncertainty-Aware Attention for Reliable Interpretation and PredictionabstractAttention mechanism is effective in both focusing the deep learning models on relevant features and interpreting them. However, attentions may be unreliable since the networks that generate them are often trained in a weakly-supervised manner. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the notion of input-dependent uncertainty to the attention mechanism, such that it generates attention for each feature with varying degrees of noise based on the given input, to learn larger variance on instances it is uncertain about. We learn this Uncertainty-aware Attention (UA) mechanism using variational inference, and validate it on various risk prediction tasks from electronic health records on which our model significantly outperforms existing attention models. The analysis of the learned attentions shows that our model generates attentions that comply with clinicians' interpretation, and provide richer interpretation via learned variance. Further evaluation of both the accuracy of the uncertainty calibration and the prediction performance with "I don't know'' decision show that UA yields networks with high reliability as well. Jay Heo, Haebeom Lee, Saehoon Kim, Juho Lee 0001, Kwang Joon Kim, Eunho Yang, Sung Ju Hwang |
NeurIPS | 5 |