VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kumar Shridhar
dblp:222/2993
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 47% Language models and text generation · 27% Generative modeling · 14% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Learning and educational technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language Environments · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › large language model uncertainty
LLM calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
causal robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
math word problem solving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Automatic Generation of Socratic Subquestions for Teaching Math Word Problems · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
posterior collapse |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Drop Out: An Adversarial Approach to Training Sequence VAEs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Drop Out: An Adversarial Approach to Training Sequence VAEs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Learning and educational technologies › educational content generation
question generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Automatic Generation of Socratic Subquestions for Teaching Math Word Problems · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language Environments · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Automatic Generation of Socratic Subquestions for Teaching Math Word Problems · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Drop Out: An Adversarial Approach to Training Sequence VAEs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.1prompting · 1.1sample consistency · 0.9post-hoc calibration · 0.9counterfactual analysis · 0.7causal inference · 0.7stochastic dropout · 0.6adversarial training · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language EnvironmentsabstractAlejandro Hernández-Cano, Alexander Hägele, Allen Hao Huang, Angelika Romanou, Antoni-Joan Solergibert, Barna Pásztor, Bettina Messmer, Dhia Garbaya, Eduard Frank Ďurech, Ido Hakimi, Juan Garcia Giraldo, Mete Ismayilzada, Negar Foroutan, Skander Moalla, Tiancheng Chen, Vinko Sabolčec, Yixuan Xu, Michael Aerni, Badr AlKhamissi, Inés Altemir Marinas, Mohammad Hossein Amani, Matin Ansaripour, Ilia Badanin, Harold Benoit, Emanuela Boros, Nicholas John Browning, Fabian Bösch, Maximilian Böther, Niklas Canova, Camille Challier, Clément Charmillot, Jonathan Coles, Jan Milan Deriu, Arnout Devos, Lukas Drescher, Daniil Dzenhaliou, Maud Ehrmann, Dongyang Fan, Simin Fan, Silin Gao, Miguel Gila, María Grandury, Diba Hashemi, Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Jiaming Jiang, Mark Klein, Andrei Kucharavy, Anastasiia Kucherenko, Frederike Lübeck, Roman Machacek, Theofilos Ioannis Manitaras, Andreas Marfurt, Kyle Matoba, Simon Matrenok, Henrique Mendonça, Fawzi Roberto Mohamed, Syrielle Montariol, Luca Mouchel, Sven Najem-Meyer, Jingwei Ni, Gennaro Oliva, Matteo Pagliardini, Elia Palme, Andrei Panferov, Léo Paoletti, Marco Passerini, Ivan Pavlov, Auguste Poiroux, Kaustubh Ponkshe, Nathan Ranchin, Javier Rando, Mathieu Sauser, Jakhongir Saydaliev, Mukhammadali Sayfiddinov, Marian Schneider, Stefano Schuppli, Marco Scialanga, Andrei Semenov, Kumar Shridhar, Raghav Singhal, Anna Sotnikova, Alexander Sternfeld, Ayush Kumar Tarun, Paul Teiletche, Jannis Vamvas, Xiaozhe Yao, Hao Zhao, Alexander Ilic, Ana Klimovic, Andreas Krause, Caglar Gulcehre, David Rosenthal, Elliott Ash, Florian Tramèr, Joost VandeVondele, Livio Veraldi, Martin Rajman, Thomas C. Schulthess, Torsten Hoefler, Antoine Bosselut, Martin Jaggi, Imanol Schlag. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Alejandro Hernández-Cano, Alexander Hägele, Allen Hao Huang, Angelika Romanou, Antoni-Joan Solergibert i Llaquet, Barna Pásztor, Bettina Messmer, Dhia Garbaya, Eduard Durech, Ido Hakimi, Juan Garcia Giraldo, Mete Ismayilzada, Negar Foroutan Eghlidi, Skander Moalla, Tiancheng Chen, Vinko Sabolcec, Yixuan Even Xu, Michael Aerni, Badr AlKhamissi, Ines Altemir Marinas, Mohammad Hossein Amani, Matin Ansaripour, Ilia Badanin, Harold Benoit, Emanuela Boros, Nicholas John Browning, Fabian Bösch, Maximilian Böther, Niklas Canova, Camille Challier, Clément Charmillot, Jonathan Coles, Jan Deriu, Arnout Devos, Lukas Drescher, Daniil Dzenhaliou, Maud Ehrmann, Dongyang Fan, Simin Fan, Silin Gao, Miguel Gila, María Grandury, Diba Hashemi, Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Jiaming Jiang, Mark Klein 0002, Andrei Kucharavy, Anastasiia Kucherenko, Frederike Lübeck, Roman Machacek, Theofilos Ioannis Manitaras, Andreas Marfurt, Kyle Matoba, Simon Matrenok, Henrique Mendonça, Fawzi Roberto Mohamed, Syrielle Montariol, Luca Mouchel, Sven Najem-Meyer, Jingwei Ni, Gennaro Oliva, Matteo Pagliardini, Elia Palme, Andrei Panferov, Léo Paoletti, Marco Passerini, Ivan Pavlov, Auguste Poiroux, Kaustubh Ponkshe, Nathan Ranchin, Javier Rando, Mathieu Sauser, Jakhongir Saydaliev, Mukhammadali Sayfiddinov, Marian Schneider, Stefano Schuppli, Marco Scialanga, Andrei Semenov, Kumar Shridhar, Raghav Singhal, Anna Sotnikova, Alexander Sternfeld, Ayush K. Tarun, Paul Teiletche, Jannis Vamvas, Xiaozhe Yao, Alexander Ilic, Ana Klimovic, Andreas Krause 0001, Caglar Gulcehre, David Rosenthal, Elliott Ash, Florian Tramèr, Joost VandeVondele, Livio Veraldi, Martin Rajman, Thomas C. Schulthess, Torsten Hoefler, Antoine Bosselut, Martin Jaggi, Imanol Schlag |
ACL (1) | 79 |
| 2025 | Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample ConsistencyabstractAccurately gauging the confidence level of Large Language Models' (LLMs) predictions is pivotal for their reliable application. However, LLMs are often uncalibrated inherently and elude conventional calibration techniques due to their proprietary nature and massive scale. In this work, we derive model confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled generations, using three measures of consistency. We extensively evaluate eleven open and closed-source models on nine reasoning datasets. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches in terms of calibration error. Meanwhile, we find that factors such as intermediate explanations, model scaling, and larger sample sizes enhance calibration, while instruction-tuning makes calibration more difficult. Moreover, confidence scores obtained from consistency can potentially enhance model performance. Finally, we offer guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to model characteristics such as the exposure to instruction-tuning and RLHF. Qing Lyu 0001, Kumar Shridhar, Chaitanya Malaviya, Li Zhang 0039, Yanai Elazar, Niket Tandon, Marianna Apidianaki, Mrinmaya Sachan, Chris Callison-Burch |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2024 | The ART of LLM Refinement: Ask, Refine, and TrustabstractKumar Shridhar, Koustuv Sinha, Andrew Cohen, Tianlu Wang, Ping Yu, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Mrinmaya Sachan, Jason Weston, Asli Celikyilmaz. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Kumar Shridhar, Koustuv Sinha, Andrew Cohen, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Mrinmaya Sachan, Jason Weston, Asli Celikyilmaz |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2023 | A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language ModelsabstractAlessandro Stolfo, Zhijing Jin, Kumar Shridhar, Bernhard Schoelkopf, Mrinmaya Sachan. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Alessandro Stolfo, Zhijing Jin 0001, Kumar Shridhar, Bernhard Schölkopf, Mrinmaya Sachan |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | Automatic Educational Question Generation with Difficulty Level Controls
Ying Jiao, Kumar Shridhar, Peng Cui 0006, Wangchunshu Zhou, Mrinmaya Sachan |
AIED | 2 |
| 2022 | Automatic Generation of Socratic Subquestions for Teaching Math Word ProblemsabstractSocratic questioning is an educational method that allows students to discover answers to complex problems by asking them a series of thoughtful questions.Generation of didactically sound questions is challenging, requiring understanding of the reasoning process involved in the problem.We hypothesize that such questioning strategy can not only enhance the human performance, but also assist the math word problem (MWP) solvers.In this work, we explore the ability of large language models (LMs) in generating sequential questions for guiding math word problem-solving.We propose various guided question generation schemes based on input conditioning and reinforcement learning.On both automatic and human quality evaluations, we find that LMs constrained with desirable question properties generate superior questions and improve the overall performance of a math word problem solver.We conduct a preliminary user study to examine the potential value of such question generation models in the education domain.Results suggest that the difficulty level of problems plays an important role in determining whether questioning improves or hinders human performance.We discuss the future of using such questioning strategies in education.https://github.com/eth-nlped/ scaffolding-generation Kumar Shridhar, Jakub Macina, Mennatallah El-Assady, Tanmay Sinha, Manu Kapur, Mrinmaya Sachan |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning to Drop Out: An Adversarial Approach to Training Sequence VAEsabstractIn principle, applying variational autoencoders (VAEs) to sequential data offers a method for controlled sequence generation, manipulation, and structured representation learning. However, training sequence VAEs is challenging: autoregressive decoders can often explain the data without utilizing the latent space, known as posterior collapse. To mitigate this, state-of-the-art models weaken' thepowerful decoder' by applying uniformly random dropout to the decoder input.We show theoretically that this removes pointwise mutual information provided by the decoder input, which is compensated for by utilizing the latent space. We then propose an adversarial training strategy to achieve information-based stochastic dropout. Compared to uniform dropout on standard text benchmark datasets, our targeted approach increases both sequence modeling performance and the information captured in the latent space. Ðorðe Miladinovic, Kumar Shridhar, Kushal Jain, Max B. Paulus, Joachim M. Buhmann, Carl Allen |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | HyperEmbed: Tradeoffs Between Resources and Performance in NLP Tasks with Hyperdimensional Computing Enabled Embedding of n-gram StatisticsabstractRecent advances in Deep Learning have led to a significant performance increase on several NLP tasks, however, the models become more and more computationally demanding. Therefore, this paper tackles the domain of computationally efficient algorithms for NLP tasks. In particular, it investigates distributed representations of$n$-gram statistics of texts. The representations are formed using hyperdimensional computing enabled embedding. These representations then serve as features, which are used as input to standard classifiers. We investigate the applicability of the embedding on one large and three small standard datasets for classification tasks using nine classifiers. The embedding achieved on par$F_{1}$scores while decreasing the time and memory requirements by several times compared to the conventional$n$-gram statistics, e.g., for one of the classifiers on a small dataset, the memory reduction was 6.18 times; while train and test speed-ups were 4.62 and 3.84 times, respectively. For many classifiers on the large dataset, memory reduction was ca. 100 times and train and test speed-ups were over 100 times. Importantly, the usage of distributed representations formed via hyperdimensional computing allows dissecting strict dependency between the dimensionality of the representation and n-gram size, thus, opening a room for tradeoffs. Kumar Shridhar, Denis Kleyko, Evgeny Osipov, Marcus Liwicki |
IJCNN | 2 |
| 2019 | Subword Semantic Hashing for Intent Classification on Small DatasetsabstractIn this paper, we introduce the use of Semantic Hashing as embedding for the task of Intent Classification and achieve state-of-the-art performance on three frequently used benchmarks. Intent Classification on a small dataset is a challenging task for data-hungry state-of-the-art Deep Learning based systems. Semantic Hashing is an attempt to overcome such a challenge and learn robust text classification. Current word embedding based methods [11], [13], [14] are dependent on vocabularies. One of the major drawbacks of such methods is out-of-vocabulary terms, especially when having small training datasets and using a wider vocabulary. This is the case in Intent Classification for chatbots, where typically small datasets are extracted from internet communication. Two problems arise with the use of internet communication. First, such datasets miss a lot of terms in the vocabulary to use word embeddings efficiently. Second, users frequently make spelling errors. Typically, the models for intent classification are not trained with spelling errors and it is difficult to think about ways in which users will make mistakes. Models depending on a word vocabulary will always face such issues. An ideal classifier should handle spelling errors inherently. With Semantic Hashing, we overcome these challenges and achieve state-of-the-art results on three datasets: Chatbot, Ask Ubuntu, and Web Applications [3]. Our benchmarks are available online. Kumar Shridhar, Ayushman Dash, Amit Sahu, Gustav Pihlgren, Vinaychandran Pondenkandath, György Kovács 0001, Foteini Liwicki, Marcus Liwicki |
IJCNN | 1 |