Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yanrui Wu

dblp:234/1163 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 71% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% Generative modeling · 5%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › abstract reasoning
abstract visual reasoning
0.912025
Cognitive Predictive Coding Network: Rethinking the Generalization in Raven's Progressive Matrices · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.912025
Cognitive Predictive Coding Network: Rethinking the Generalization in Raven's Progressive Matrices · ACM Multimedia 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
physical reasoning
0.912025
PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based Reasoning · ACL (1) 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › abstract reasoning › abstract visual reasoning
raven's progressive matrices
0.912025
Cognitive Predictive Coding Network: Rethinking the Generalization in Raven's Progressive Matrices · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
diagram understanding
0.312025
Diagram-Driven Course Questions Generation · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
multimodal generation
0.312025
Diagram-Driven Course Questions Generation · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

question generation · 1.7diagram parsing · 1.7step-level evaluation · 0.9predictive coding · 0.9mutual information constraint · 0.9free energy minimization · 0.9answer-level scoring · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Memory-enriched thought-by-thought framework for complex Diagram Question Answering
Xinyu Zhang 0021, Lingling Zhang 0005, Yanrui Wu, Muye Huang, Qianying Wang 0002, Jun Liu 0002
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.3
2025 PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based Reasoning
abstract
Large language models demonstrate remarkable capabilities across various domains, especially mathematics and logic reasoning. However, current evaluations overlook physics-based reasoning - a complex task requiring physics theorems and constraints. We present PhysReason, a 1,200-problem benchmark comprising knowledge-based (25%) and reasoning-based (75%) problems, where the latter are divided into three difficulty levels (easy, medium, hard). Notably, problems require an average of 8.1 solution steps, with hard requiring 15.6, reflecting the complexity of physics-based reasoning. We propose the Physics Solution Auto Scoring Framework, incorporating efficient answer-level and comprehensive step-level evaluations. Top-performing models like Deepseek-R1, Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking, and o3-mini-high achieve less than 60% on answer-level evaluation, with performance dropping from knowledge questions (75.11%) to hard problems (31.95%). Through step-level evaluation, we identified four key bottlenecks: Physics Theorem Application, Physics Process Understanding, Calculation, and Physics Condition Analysis. These findings position PhysReason as a novel and comprehensive benchmark for evaluating physics-based reasoning capabilities in large language models.
Xinyu Zhang 0021, Yanrui Wu, Chengyou Jia, Basura Fernando, Zheng Shou 0001, Lingling Zhang 0005, Jun Liu 0036
ACL (1)3
2025 Diagram-Driven Course Questions Generation
abstract
Xinyu Zhang, Lingling Zhang, Yanrui Wu, Muye Huang, Wenjun Wu, Bo Li, Shaowei Wang, Basura Fernando, Jun Liu. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Xinyu Zhang 0021, Lingling Zhang 0005, Yanrui Wu, Muye Huang, Basura Fernando, Jun Liu 0002
EMNLP3
2025 Cognitive Predictive Coding Network: Rethinking the Generalization in Raven's Progressive Matrices
abstract
Abstract visual reasoning, exemplified by Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM), remains a significant challenge in artificial intelligence. A critical difficulty lies in disentangling abstract relational rules from image-specific features, as these rules operate independently of visual appearances. To address this challenge, we propose the Cognitive Predictive Coding Network (CPCN), inspired by predictive coding theory from cognitive science. CPCN features a three-component architecture: a Relation Disentangler that separates abstract rules from image-specific features through prediction error minimization; Stacked Free Energy Minimizers (FEMs) that leverage energy minimization principles to progressively reduce uncertainty during hierarchical abstraction; and a classifier for solution identification. Unlike previous approaches, our model employs mutual information constraints to explicitly separate relation-relevant and relation-irrelevant features, enabling more robust pattern recognition. Our novel FEMs provide a principled approach to uncertainty reduction through iterative refinement of pattern understanding. Experiments demonstrate PAH's superior performance across multiple benchmarks (such as 98.9% on RAVEN-Fair) with state-of-the-art 59.7% average accuracy across all PGM subtasks.
Xinyu Zhang 0021, Lingling Zhang 0005, Yanrui Wu, Muye Huang, Jun Liu 0002
ACM Multimedia3
2023 Unsupervised Joint-Semantics Autoencoder Hashing for Multimedia Retrieval
Yunfei Chen 0015, Yinan Li 0007, Yanrui Wu, Zhan Yang 0001
ICONIP (5)4
2022 Low-res MobileNet: An efficient lightweight network for low-resolution image classification in resource-constrained scenarios
Haiying Yuan, Junpeng Cheng, Yanrui Wu
Multim. Tools Appl.3