Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Murtagh

dblp:237/8657 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 27% Health and well-being technologies · 26% Human-AI interaction · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
affective computing
0.412020
Using the Geneva Emotion Wheel to Measure Perceived Affect in Human-Robot Interaction · HRI 2020
Wearable and physiological sensing
emotion recognition
0.412020
Using the Geneva Emotion Wheel to Measure Perceived Affect in Human-Robot Interaction · HRI 2020
Health and well-being technologies
long-term care
0.412019
Meeting Stevie: Perceptions of a Socially Assistive Robot by Residents and Staff in a Long-Term Care Facility · HRI 2019
Human-robot interaction › assistive robotics
socially assistive robotics
0.412019
Meeting Stevie: Perceptions of a Socially Assistive Robot by Residents and Staff in a Long-Term Care Facility · HRI 2019
Health and well-being technologies
elderly care
0.112019
Meeting Stevie: Perceptions of a Socially Assistive Robot by Residents and Staff in a Long-Term Care Facility · HRI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.4geneva emotion wheel · 0.4mixed-method study · 0.4focus groups · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Using the Geneva Emotion Wheel to Measure Perceived Affect in Human-Robot Interaction
abstract
The ability to clearly communicate a wide range of emotional states is considered a desirable trait for social robots. This research proposes that the Geneva Emotion Wheel (GEW), a self-report instrument for measuring emotional reactions, has strong potential for use as a tool for evaluating the expression of affective content by robots. Factors that make the GEW advantageous over existing evaluation methods include: ease of administration, reduction in the importance of word labels, and coverage of "no emotion" states. Statistical analyses of the GEW are proposed, isolating quantitative metrics of emotion distinctness. An experiment requiring participants to rate the perceived emotion of a social robot was conducted, employing the proposed methods. Analysis using the GEW revealed significant differences in the reliability of different expressions to clearly convey emotional states. The GEW provided a repeatable, systematic framework for estimating perceived affect of robot expression. Thus, the results suggest the GEW offers a powerful tool for design purposes as well as analysis. To support future research using the GEW, the software used for the analysis has been packaged and made available as an open-source resource to the community.
Adam K. Coyne, Andrew Murtagh, Conor McGinn
HRI2
2019 Meeting Stevie: Perceptions of a Socially Assistive Robot by Residents and Staff in a Long-Term Care Facility
abstract
Socially assistive robots (SARs) have the potential to improve working conditions of care workers, empower vulnerable people to retain independence, and even provide social companionship. Through a series of focus groups, this study explores how older adults and professional care workers in a Continued Care Retirement Community (CCRC) perceived a bespoke SAR platform known as Stevie. Using a mixed-method approach, it emerged that both care staff and residents developed a strong fondness for the robot, perceived it to be useful, and could envision a range of useful applications.
Conor McGinn, Eamonn Bourke, Andrew Murtagh, Cian Donovan, Michael Cullinan
HRI3