Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jeremy Urann

dblp:237/8739 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Games and playful interaction · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › entertainment robotics
robot theater
0.412019
Dancing with ChairBots · HRI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interdisciplinary artistic collaboration · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Dancing with ChairBots
abstract
Over the summer of 2018, CHARISMA Robotics Laboratory at Oregon State University invited a Theater Artist to collaborate on two interdisciplinary robot theater productions using ChairBots and human performers. Both productions shared in a three-week development period, the same development team and performing robots, and culminated in live performances. This paper acts as a companion to the video documentation of these productions, addressing the novelty and contributions, both technical and creative, of dancing with robot furniture.
Jeremy Urann, Abrar Fallatah, Heather Knight
HRI1
2019 The Robot Show Must Go On: Effective Responses to Robot Failures
abstract
This paper consists of a failure analysis of two robot performance productions. Both productions included three-week rehearsal periods, and culminated in live performances including both robots and humans. To develop these productions, a theater artist collaborated with a robotics lab to develop, (1) a narrative dance performed live on stage and (2) an improvisational performance in a public space. While the interdisciplinary team did not set out to explore robot failures, failures played an ever-present role during the eighteen rehearsals and two live performances. This paper details strategies for addressing, planning for, and rehearsing responses to robot failures on stage, both technical and choreographic. In addition to scaffolding future robot theater performances, we discuss how these strategies apply to other customer- and audience-facing robots, including sponsor demos. The on-stage exploration of robot chairs and human performers also suggests that humans can conceptualize minimal robots as both characters and props, moving fluidly from one to the other. We hope these strategies ensure that future audiences will want the robot shows to go on, as well as expand ideas about the types of robots that can be cast in future human-robot productions.
Abrar Fallatah, Jeremy Urann, Heather Knight
IROS2