Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elena Goetz Davis
dblp:239/7862
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities › social media research
social media use |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding Perceptions of Problematic Facebook Use: When People Experience Negative Life Impact and a Lack of Control · CHI 2019 |
Health and well-being technologies
digital well-being |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding Perceptions of Problematic Facebook Use: When People Experience Negative Life Impact and a Lack of Control · CHI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.8behavioral log analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Understanding Perceptions of Problematic Facebook Use: When People Experience Negative Life Impact and a Lack of ControlabstractWhile many people use social network sites to connect with friends and family, some feel that their use is problematic, seriously affecting their sleep, work, or life. Pairing a survey of 20,000 Facebook users measuring perceptions of problematic use with behavioral and demographic data, we examined Facebook activities associated with problematic use as well as the kinds of people most likely to experience it. People who feel their use is problematic are more likely to be younger, male, and going through a major life event such as a breakup. They spend more time on the platform, particularly at night, and spend proportionally more time looking at profiles and less time browsing their News Feeds. They also message their friends more frequently. While they are more likely to respond to notifications, they are also more likely to deactivate their accounts, perhaps in an effort to better manage their time. Further, they are more likely to have seen content about social media or phone addiction. Notably, people reporting problematic use rate the site as more valuable to them, highlighting the complex relationship between technology use and well-being. A better understanding of problematic Facebook use can inform the design of context-appropriate and supportive tools to help people become more in control. Justin Cheng, Moira Burke, Elena Goetz Davis |
CHI | 3 |