Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luke S. Murray

dblp:239/7897 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 77% Design research and methods · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › electronic health records
clinical documentation
0.512021
MedKnowts: Unified Documentation and Information Retrieval for Electronic Health Records · UIST 2021
Medical and health informatics › clinical text processing
clinical information retrieval
0.512021
MedKnowts: Unified Documentation and Information Retrieval for Electronic Health Records · UIST 2021
Information retrieval
search engines
0.112021
MedKnowts: Unified Documentation and Information Retrieval for Electronic Health Records · UIST 2021
Design research and methods › user-centered design
need finding
0.112019
Opportunities for Automating Email Processing: A Need-Finding Study · CHI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.4script authoring platform · 0.4design workshop · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 MedKnowts: Unified Documentation and Information Retrieval for Electronic Health Records
abstract
Clinical documentation can be transformed by Electronic Health Records, yet the documentation process is still a tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone process. Clinicians are faced with multi-faceted requirements and fragmented interfaces for information exploration and documentation. These challenges are only exacerbated in the Emergency Department—clinicians often see 35 patients in one shift, during which they have to synthesize an often previously unknown patient’s medical records in order to reach a tailored diagnosis and treatment plan. To better support this information synthesis, clinical documentation tools must enable rapid contextual access to the patient’s medical record. MedKnowts is an integrated note-taking editor and information retrieval system which unifies the documentation and search process and provides concise synthesized concept-oriented slices of the patient’s medical record. MedKnowts automatically captures structured data while still allowing users the flexibility of natural language. MedKnowts leverages this structure to enable easier parsing of long notes, auto-populated text, and proactive information retrieval, easing the documentation burden.
Luke S. Murray, Divya Gopinath, Monica Agrawal, Steven Horng, David A. Sontag, David R. Karger
UIST1
2019 Opportunities for Automating Email Processing: A Need-Finding Study
abstract
Email management consumes significant effort from senders and recipients. Some of this work might be automatable. We performed a mixed-methods need-finding study to learn: (i) what sort of automatic email handling users want, and (ii) what kinds of information and computation are needed to support that automation. Our investigation included a design workshop to identify categories of needs, a survey to better understand those categories, and a classification of existing email automation software to determine which needs have been addressed. Our results highlight the need for: a richer data model for rules, more ways to manage attention, leveraging internal and external email context, complex processing such as response aggregation, and affordances for senders. To further investigate our findings, we developed a platform for authoring small scripts over a user's inbox. Of the automations found in our studies, half are impossible in popular email clients, motivating new design directions.
Soya Park, Amy X. Zhang, Luke S. Murray, David R. Karger
CHI3