Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ethan Hardacre

dblp:239/7922 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 87% Wearable and physiological sensing · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative editing
collaborative writing
0.412019
Eye-Write: Gaze Sharing for Collaborative Writing · CHI 2019
Collaborative and social computing › awareness
shared gaze
0.412019
Eye-Write: Gaze Sharing for Collaborative Writing · CHI 2019
Wearable and physiological sensing › eye tracking
gaze-based interaction
0.112019
Eye-Write: Gaze Sharing for Collaborative Writing · CHI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.4qualitative analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Eye-Write: Gaze Sharing for Collaborative Writing
abstract
Online collaborative writing is an increasingly common practice. Despite its positive effect on productivity and quality of work, it poses challenges to co-authors in remote settings because of limitations in conversational grounding and activity awareness. This paper presents Eye-Write, a novel system which allows two co-authors to see at will the location of their partner's gaze within a text editor. To investigate the effect of shared gaze on collaboration, we conducted a study on synchronous remote collaborative writing in academic settings with 20 dyads. Gaze sharing improved five aspects of perceived collaboration quality: mutual understanding, level of joint attention, flow of communication, level of negotiation, and awareness of the co-author's activity. Furthermore, dyads whose participants deactivated the gaze visualization showed a smaller degree of collaboration. Our findings offer insights for future text editors by outlining the benefits of at-will gaze sharing in collaborative writing.
Grete Helena Kütt, Ethan Hardacre, Alexandra Papoutsaki
CHI3