Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ethan Hardacre
dblp:239/7922
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 87% Wearable and physiological sensing · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative editing
collaborative writing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Eye-Write: Gaze Sharing for Collaborative Writing · CHI 2019 |
Collaborative and social computing › awareness
shared gaze |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Eye-Write: Gaze Sharing for Collaborative Writing · CHI 2019 |
Wearable and physiological sensing › eye tracking
gaze-based interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Eye-Write: Gaze Sharing for Collaborative Writing · CHI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.4qualitative analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Eye-Write: Gaze Sharing for Collaborative WritingabstractOnline collaborative writing is an increasingly common practice. Despite its positive effect on productivity and quality of work, it poses challenges to co-authors in remote settings because of limitations in conversational grounding and activity awareness. This paper presents Eye-Write, a novel system which allows two co-authors to see at will the location of their partner's gaze within a text editor. To investigate the effect of shared gaze on collaboration, we conducted a study on synchronous remote collaborative writing in academic settings with 20 dyads. Gaze sharing improved five aspects of perceived collaboration quality: mutual understanding, level of joint attention, flow of communication, level of negotiation, and awareness of the co-author's activity. Furthermore, dyads whose participants deactivated the gaze visualization showed a smaller degree of collaboration. Our findings offer insights for future text editors by outlining the benefits of at-will gaze sharing in collaborative writing. Grete Helena Kütt, Ethan Hardacre, Alexandra Papoutsaki |
CHI | 3 |