Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Weiyi Ding
dblp:243/3328
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
cognitive alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CogLign: Interpretable Text Sentiment Determination by Aligning Cognition Between EEG-Derived Brain Graph and Text-Derived Knowledge Graph · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CogLign: Interpretable Text Sentiment Determination by Aligning Cognition Between EEG-Derived Brain Graph and Text-Derived Knowledge Graph · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CogLign: Interpretable Text Sentiment Determination by Aligning Cognition Between EEG-Derived Brain Graph and Text-Derived Knowledge Graph · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge graph embedding · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7cognition alignment · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Near-Field Wideband Hybrid Beamforming With Deep Reinforcement LearningabstractA deep reinforcement learning (DRL) method is proposed for hybrid beamforming in near-field wideband communication systems, aiming to alleviate the harmful near-field beam splitting issue caused by the spatial-wideband effect. Compared to the far-field beam splitting issue that occurs only in the angle domain, the near-field beam splitting issue extends to the distance domain and is thus more challenging to address. A hybrid beamforming architecture with true-time delayers (TTDs) is exploited to address the near-field beam splitting issue and facilitate the maximization of spectral efficiency (SE) across large bandwidth for downlink multi-user communications. However, the conventional iterative hybrid beamforming optimization methods, such as the weighted minimum mean-square method, often exhibit high computational complexity and are thus difficult to adapt the dynamic channel in a real-time manner. Hence, a DRL-based algorithm is propose to select fully-digital codewords from the designed near-field wideband beamforming codebook. To further approximate the selected codewords in the considered hybrid-beamforming architecture, a three-stage hybrid beamforming approximation (HBA) algorithm is proposed to minimize the fully-digital approximation error by jointly optimizing the TTD-based analog beamformers and baseband digital beamformers. Numerical results show that: (1) the proposed DRL-HBA solution for hybrid beamforming significantly increases the SE; (2) the hybrid beamforming architecture with TTDs can eliminate the near-field beam splitting effect and achieve beam focusing across wide band. Weiyi Ding, Gang Yang 0005, Jun Liu 0052, Ying-Chang Liang, Yuanwei Liu |
IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. | 1 |
| 2025 | CogLign: Interpretable Text Sentiment Determination by Aligning Cognition Between EEG-Derived Brain Graph and Text-Derived Knowledge GraphabstractNowadays, detecting sentiment or emotion from user generated texts has been intensively studied in natural language understanding, especially via neural-based models based on text representation. However, the interpretability on how could the final text sentiment be determined by neural-based text representation has not been thoroughly unfolded yet. Consequently, in this paper, we proposeCogLignwhich injects theneural-cognitionderived from Electroencephalogram (EEG)-signal into theneural-basedtext sentiment analysis model, aimed at learning the activation of brain regions stimulated by different sentiments, so as to guide our proposedCogLignto make proper determination on text sentiment in brain-like way. Specifically, on the one hand, the given videos in different sentiments have been watched bysubjects, during which the EEG-signals are monitored to construct brain connectivity pattern asbrain graph(BG), attaining more obvious sentiment response on brain region activation forneural-cognition. On the other hand, we interpret the video-plots (or video-semantics) along timeline into text, where the entire video-interpreted-text will bestrictly boundwith the wholeEEG-signal-sequencebysegmentvia the fixed size oftime-window. Then, entities and relations are extracted from the video-interpreted-text to constructknowledge graph(KG), depicting text semantics. Next, mapping fromentities(or nodes) inKGtoEEG-Electrodes(or nodes) inBG, further dated back to different brain regions, has been learned viacognition alignmentbetween the EEG-derivedBGand text-derivedKG. In this way, by aligningneural cognitionfrombrain graphwith thesemantic cognitionfromknowledge graph, our proposed frameworkCogLigncan not only achieve the overall best sentiment analysis performance on thevideo-interpreted-text, but can also detect brain connectivity patterns in different sentiments more consistent with the prior conclusion of brain region sentiment preference, revealing competitiveinterpretabilityon text sentiment determination. Huan Rong, Wenxuan Ji, Tinghuai Ma, Weiyi Ding, Victor S. Sheng |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 4 |