Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sonia Jaffe

dblp:244/6931 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8924-0294ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › developer studies › developer behavior
developer productivity
0.612022
A Tale of Two Cities: Software Developers Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.612022
A Tale of Two Cities: Software Developers Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022
Collaborative and social computing
remote collaboration
0.212022
A Tale of Two Cities: Software Developers Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thematic analysis · 1.1survey · 1.1statistical analysis · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Format Matters: Comparing the Inclusiveness and Effectiveness of Hybrid and Remote Meetings
abstract
The surge in remote and hybrid work has provided many benefits in terms of flexibility and autonomy, but it also presents challenges when it comes to team collaboration and meetings. Using a mixed-methods field study, we compare hybrid and remote meeting configurations to better understand how to improve the inclusiveness and effectiveness of these different meeting modalities. Our findings indicate that overall, fully-remote meetings are the most inclusive and effective. Fully-remote meetings are perceived as more inclusive of remote attendees despite their lower chat usage compared to hybrid meetings. We also find that people's preferred format varies depending on the purpose or type of meeting and the skill set of the meeting moderator. We provide recommendations for improving meeting inclusion and effectiveness in both hybrid and remote meetings, such as training moderators and integrating chats with the main meeting.
Matin Yarmand, Liana Kreamer, Siddharth Suri, Sonia Jaffe
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.4
2022 A Tale of Two Cities: Software Developers Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic
abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has shaken the world to its core and has provoked an overnight exodus of developers who normally worked in an office setting to working from home. The magnitude of this shift and the factors that have accompanied this new unplanned work setting go beyond what the software engineering community has previously understood to be remote work. To find out how developers and their productivity were affected, we distributed two surveys (with a combined total of 3,634 responses that answered all required questions) weeks apart to understand the presence and prevalence of the benefits, challenges, and opportunities to improve this special circumstance of remote work. From our thematic qualitative analysis and statistical quantitative analysis, we find that there is a dichotomy of developer experiences influenced by many different factors (that for some are a benefit, while for others a challenge). For example, a benefit for some was being close to family members but for others having family members share their working space and interrupting their focus, was a challenge. Our surveys led to powerful narratives from respondents and revealed the scale at which these experiences exist to provide insights as to how the future of (pandemic) remote work can evolve.
Denae Ford, Margaret-Anne D. Storey, Thomas Zimmermann 0001, Christian Bird, Sonia Jaffe, Chandra Shekhar Maddila, Jenna L. Butler, Brian Houck, Nachiappan Nagappan
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.5