Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrea Seveso

dblp:247/6513 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7132-7703ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 3 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 47% Information extraction and text analysis · 20% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 77% Information retrieval · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › local explanation
contrastive explanation
0.612022
The Good, the Bad, and the Explainer: A Tool for Contrastive Explanations of Text Classifiers · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
The Good, the Bad, and the Explainer: A Tool for Contrastive Explanations of Text Classifiers · IJCAI 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › ontology learning
taxonomy learning
0.512021
A Human-AI Teaming Approach for Incremental Taxonomy Learning from Text · IJCAI 2021
Computational finance and economics
labor market analytics
0.512021
Skills2Graph: Processing million Job Ads to face the Job Skill Mismatch Problem · IJCAI 2021
Recommender systems › domain-specific recommendation
job recommendation
0.512021
Skills2Job: A Recommender System that Encodes Job Offer Embeddings on Graph Databases (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
intrinsic evaluation
0.112021
Skills2Graph: Processing million Job Ads to face the Job Skill Mismatch Problem · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
0.112021
Skills2Graph: Processing million Job Ads to face the Job Skill Mismatch Problem · IJCAI 2021
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
text embedding
0.112021
Skills2Job: A Recommender System that Encodes Job Offer Embeddings on Graph Databases (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2021
Human-AI interaction
human-in-the-loop
0.112021
A Human-AI Teaming Approach for Incremental Taxonomy Learning from Text · IJCAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 1.0human-in-the-loop · 1.0embedding · 1.0distributional semantics · 1.0co-occurrence statistics · 1.0binary decision diagram · 0.6word embeddings · 0.5text embedding · 0.5semantic similarity · 0.5intrinsic evaluation · 0.5graph database · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ITALIC: An Italian Culture-Aware Natural Language Benchmark
abstract
Andrea Seveso, Daniele Potertì, Edoardo Federici, Mario Mezzanzanica, Fabio Mercorio. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Andrea Seveso, Daniele Potertì, Edoardo Federici, Mario Mezzanzanica, Fabio Mercorio
NAACL (Long Papers)1
2025 A Benchmark to Evaluate LLMs' Proficiency on Italian Student Competencies
Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica, Daniele Potertì, Antonio Serino, Andrea Seveso
ECML/PKDD (8)5
2024 Model-contrastive explanations through symbolic reasoning
abstract
Explaining how two machine learning classification models differ in their behaviour is gaining significance in eXplainable AI, given the increasing diffusion of learning-based decision support systems. Human decision-makers deal with more than one machine learning model in several practical situations. Consequently, the importance of understanding how two machine learning models work beyond their prediction performances is key to understanding their behaviour, differences, and likeness. Some attempts have been made to address these problems, for instance, by explaining text classifiers in a time-contrastive fashion. In this paper, we present MERLIN, a novel eXplainable AI approach that provides contrastive explanations of two machine learning models, introducing the concept of model-contrastive explanations. We propose an encoding that allows MERLIN to work with both text and tabular data and with mixed continuous and discrete features. To show the effectiveness of our approach, we evaluate it on an extensive set of benchmark datasets. MERLIN is also implemented as a python-pip package.
Lorenzo Malandri, Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica, Andrea Seveso
Decis. Support Syst.4
2022 The Good, the Bad, and the Explainer: A Tool for Contrastive Explanations of Text Classifiers
abstract
In the last few years, we have been witnessing the increasing deployment of machine learning-based systems, which act as black boxes whose behaviour is hidden to end-users. As a side-effect, this contributes to increasing the need for explainable methods and tools to support the coordination between humans and ML models towards collaborative decision-making. In this paper, we demonstrate ContrXT, a novel tool that computes the differences in the classification logic of two distinct trained models, reasoning on their symbolic representation through Binary Decision Diagrams. ContrXT is available as a pip package and API.
Lorenzo Malandri, Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica, Navid Nobani, Andrea Seveso
IJCAI5
2021 NEO: A System for Identifying New Emerging Occupation from Job Ads
abstract
We demonstrate NEO, a tool for automatically enriching the European Occupation and Skill Taxonomy (ESCO) with terms that represents new occupations extracted from million Online Job Advertisements (OJAs). NEO proposes (i) a novel metric that allows one to measure the semantic similarity between words in a taxonomy, and (ii) a set of measures that estimate the adherence of new terms to the most suited taxonomic concept, enabling the user to evaluate the suggestions. To test its effectiveness, NEO has been evaluated over 2M+ 2018 UK job ads, along with a user-study to confirm the usefulness of NEO in the taxonomy enrichment task.
Anna Giabelli, Lorenzo Malandri, Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica, Andrea Seveso
AAAI5
2021 Skills2Job: A Recommender System that Encodes Job Offer Embeddings on Graph Databases (Student Abstract)
abstract
We propose a recommender system that, starting from a set of users skills, identifies the most suitable jobs as they emerge from a large text of Online Job Vacancies (OJVs). To this aim, we process 2.5M+ OJVs posted in three different countries (United Kingdom, France and Germany), generating several embeddings and performing an intrinsic evaluation of their quality. Besides, we compute a measure of skill importance for each occupation in each country, the Revealed Comparative Advantage (rca). The best vector models, together with the rca, are used to feed a graph database, which will serve as the keystone for the recommender system. Finally, a user study of 10 validates the effectiveness of Skills2Job, both in terms of precision and nDGC.
Andrea Seveso, Anna Giabelli, Lorenzo Malandri, Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica
AAAI1
2021 Skills2Graph: Processing million Job Ads to face the Job Skill Mismatch Problem
abstract
In this paper, we present Skills2Graph, a tool that, starting from a set of users’ professional skills, identifies the most suitable jobs as they emerge from a large corpus of 2.5M+ Online Job Vacancies (OJVs) posted in three different countries (the United Kingdom, France, and Germany). To this aim, we rely both on co-occurrence statistics - computing a count-based measure of skill-relevance named Revealed Comparative Advantage (rca) - and distributional semantics - generating several embeddings on the OJVs corpus and performing an intrinsic evaluation of their quality. Results, evaluated through a user study of 10 labor market experts, show a high P@3 for the recommendations provided by Skills2Graph, and a high nDCG (0.985 and 0.984 in a [0,1] range), that indicates a strong correlation between the experts’ scores and the rankings generated by Skills2Graph.
Anna Giabelli, Lorenzo Malandri, Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica, Andrea Seveso
IJCAI5
2021 A Human-AI Teaming Approach for Incremental Taxonomy Learning from Text
abstract
Taxonomies provide a structured representation of semantic relations between lexical terms, acting as the backbone of many applications. The research proposed herein addresses the topic of taxonomy enrichment using an ”human-in-the-loop” semi-supervised approach. I will be investigating possible ways to extend and enrich a taxonomy using corpora of unstructured text data. The objective is to develop a methodological framework potentially applicable to any domain.
Andrea Seveso, Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica
IJCAI1
2020 eXDiL: A Tool for Classifying and eXplaining Hospital Discharge Letters
Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica, Andrea Seveso
CD-MAKE3
2020 NEO: A Tool for Taxonomy Enrichment with New Emerging Occupations
Anna Giabelli, Lorenzo Malandri, Fabio Mercorio, Mario Mezzanzanica, Andrea Seveso
ISWC (2)5
2019 Programmed Inefficiencies in DSS-Supported Human Decision Making
Federico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, Davide Ciucci, Andrea Seveso
MDAI4