Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wayne Fu

dblp:247/9671 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-AI interaction · 59% Design research and methods · 22% Health and well-being technologies · 15%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › human-AI collaboration
human-LLM collaboration
1.012026
Exploring the Human-LLM Synergy in Advancing Theory-driven Qualitative Analysis · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2026
Design research and methods
qualitative analysis
1.012026
Exploring the Human-LLM Synergy in Advancing Theory-driven Qualitative Analysis · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2026
Health and well-being technologies › mental health technology
mental health chatbot
0.712023
Exploring Effects of Chatbot-based Social Contact on Reducing Mental Illness Stigma · CHI 2023
Empirical software engineering
qualitative research
0.312026
Exploring the Human-LLM Synergy in Advancing Theory-driven Qualitative Analysis · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.0iterative coding · 2.0disagreement analysis · 2.0narrative design · 0.7mixed-method study · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Exploring the Human-LLM Synergy in Advancing Theory-driven Qualitative Analysis
abstract
Qualitative coding is a demanding yet crucial research method in the field of Human–Computer Interaction (HCI). While recent studies have shown the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform qualitative coding within theoretical frameworks, their potential for collaborative human-LLM discovery and generation of new insights beyond initial theory remains underexplored. To bridge this gap, we proposed CHALET , a novel approach that harnesses the power of human-LLM partnership to advance theory-driven qualitative analysis by facilitating iterative coding, disagreement analysis, and conceptualization of qualitative data. We demonstrated CHALET ’s utility by applying it to the qualitative analysis of conversations related to mental-illness stigma, using the attribution model as the theoretical framework. Results highlighted the unique contribution of human-LLM collaboration in uncovering latent themes of stigma across the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions. We discuss the methodological implications of the human-LLM collaborative approach to theory-based qualitative analysis for the HCI community and beyond.
Han Meng, Yitian Yang, Wayne Fu, Jungup Lee, Yi-Chieh Lee
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.3
2023 Exploring Effects of Chatbot-based Social Contact on Reducing Mental Illness Stigma
abstract
Chatbots have been designed to provide interventions in mental healthcare. However, how chatbot-based social contact can mitigate social stigma in mental illness remains under-explored. We designed two chatbots that deliver either first-person or third-person narratives about mental illness and evaluated them using a mixed methods study. Compared to a web survey group, participants in both chatbot groups decreased their beliefs that individuals are personally responsible for their mental illnesses, and increased their intentions to help. Additionally, participants in the first-person chatbot group showed a reduced level of fear, and a lower desire for social distance from people with mental illness. Many in the first-person chatbot group also reported a feeling of relationship with the chatbot, and chose to phrase their responses empathetically. Results demonstrated that chatbot-based social contact has promising potential for mitigating mental illness stigma. Implications for designing chatbot-based social contact are discussed.
Yi-Chieh Lee, Yichao Cui, Jack Jamieson, Wayne Fu, Naomi Yamashita
CHI4