Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Atefeh Mahdavi Goloujeh

dblp:248/9596 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-2369-7263ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › AI education
AI literacy
0.812024
Testing, Socializing, Exploring: Characterizing Middle Schoolers' Approaches to and Conceptions of ChatGPT · CHI 2024
Human-AI interaction › generative AI
text-to-image generation
0.812024
Is It AI or Is It Me? Understanding Users' Prompt Journey with Text-to-Image Generative AI Tools · CHI 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.212024
Is It AI or Is It Me? Understanding Users' Prompt Journey with Text-to-Image Generative AI Tools · CHI 2024
Human-AI interaction
generative AI
0.212024
Testing, Socializing, Exploring: Characterizing Middle Schoolers' Approaches to and Conceptions of ChatGPT · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thematic analysis · 1.5semi-structured interviews · 1.5focus groups · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Testing, Socializing, Exploring: Characterizing Middle Schoolers' Approaches to and Conceptions of ChatGPT
abstract
As generative AI rapidly enters everyday life, educational interventions for teaching about AI need to cater to how young people, in particular middle schoolers who are at a critical age for reasoning skills and identity formation, conceptualize and interact with AI. We conducted nine focus groups with 24 middle school students to elicit their interests, conceptions of, and approaches to a popular generative AI tool, ChatGPT. We highlight a) personally and culturally-relevant topics to this population, b) three distinct approaches in students’ open-ended interactions with ChatGPT: AI testing-oriented, AI socializing-oriented, and content exploring-oriented, and 3) an improved understanding of youths’ conceptions and misconceptions of generative AI. While misconceptions highlight gaps in understanding what generative AI is and how it works, most learners show interest in learning about what AI is and what it can do. We discuss the implications of these conceptions for designing AI literacy interventions in museums.
Yasmine Belghith, Atefeh Mahdavi Goloujeh, Brian Magerko, Duri Long, Tom McKlin
CHI2
2024 Is It AI or Is It Me? Understanding Users' Prompt Journey with Text-to-Image Generative AI Tools
abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has witnessed unprecedented growth in text-to-image AI tools. Yet, much remains unknown about users’ prompt journey with such tools in the wild. In this paper, we posit that designing human-centered text-to-image AI tools requires a clear understanding of how individuals intuitively approach crafting prompts, and what challenges they may encounter. To address this, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 existing users of a text-to-image AI tool. Our findings (1) offer insights into users’ prompt journey including structures and processes for writing, evaluating, and refining prompts in text-to-image AI tools and (2) indicate that users must overcome barriers to aligning AI to their intents, and mastering prompt crafting knowledge. From the findings, we discuss the prompt journey as an individual yet a social experience and highlight opportunities for aligning text-to-image AI tools and users’ intents.
Atefeh Mahdavi Goloujeh, Anne Sullivan, Brian Magerko
CHI1