Automated machine learning (AutoML) was formed around the fundamental objectives of automatically and efficiently configuring machine learning (ML) workflows, aiding the research of new ML algorithms, and contributing to the democratization of ML by making it accessible to a broader audience. Over the past decade, commendable achievements in AutoML have primarily focused on optimizing predictive performance. This focused progress, while substantial, raises questions about how well AutoML has met its broader, original goals. In this position paper, we argue that a key to unlocking AutoML’s full potential lies in addressing the currently underexplored aspect of user interaction with AutoML systems, including their diverse roles, expectations, and expertise. We envision a more human-centered approach in future AutoML research, promoting the collaborative design of ML systems that tightly integrates the complementary strengths of human expertise and AutoML methodologies.

Hyperparameter optimization constitutes a large part of typical modern machine learning (ML) workflows. This arises from the fact that ML methods and corresponding preprocessing steps often only yield optimal performance when hyperparameters are properly tuned. But in many applications, we are not only interested in optimizing ML pipelines solely for predictive accuracy; additional metrics or constraints must be considered when determining an optimal configuration, resulting in a multi-objective optimization problem. This is often neglected in practice, due to a lack of knowledge and readily available software implementations for multi-objective hyperparameter optimization. In this work, we introduce the reader to the basics of multi-objective hyperparameter optimization and motivate its usefulness in applied ML. Furthermore, we provide an extensive survey of existing optimization strategies from the domains of evolutionary algorithms and Bayesian optimization. We illustrate the utility of multi-objective optimization in several specific ML applications, considering objectives such as operating conditions, prediction time, sparseness, fairness, interpretability, and robustness.

Automated hyperparameter optimization (HPO) has gained great popularity and is an important component of most automated machine learning frameworks. However, the process of designing HPO algorithms is still an unsystematic and manual process: new algorithms are often built on top of prior work, where limitations are identified and improvements are proposed. Even though this approach is guided by expert knowledge, it is still somewhat arbitrary. The process rarely allows for gaining a holistic understanding of which algorithmic components drive performance and carries the risk of overlooking good algorithmic design choices. We present a principled approach to automated benchmark-driven algorithm design applied to multifidelity HPO (MF-HPO). First, we formalize a rich space of MF-HPO candidates that includes, but is not limited to, common existing HPO algorithms and then present a configurable framework covering this space. To find the best candidate automatically and systematically, we follow a programming-by-optimization approach and search over the space of algorithm candidates via Bayesian optimization. We challenge whether the found design choices are necessary or could be replaced by more naive and simpler ones by performing an ablation analysis. We observe that using a relatively simple configuration (in some ways, simpler than established methods) performs very well as long as some critical configuration parameters are set to the right value.

Automated hyperparameter optimization (HPO) can support practitioners to obtain peak performance in machine learning models.However, there is often a lack of valuable insights into the effects of different hyperparameters on the final model performance.This lack of explainability makes it difficult to trust and understand the automated HPO process and its results.We suggest using interpretable machine learning (IML) to gain insights from the experimental data obtained during HPO with Bayesian optimization (BO).BO tends to focus on promising regions with potential high-performance configurations and thus induces a sampling bias.Hence, many IML techniques, such as the partial dependence plot (PDP), carry the risk of generating biased interpretations.By leveraging the posterior uncertainty of the BO surrogate model, we introduce a variant of the PDP with estimated confidence bands.We propose to partition the hyperparameter space to obtain more confident and reliable PDPs in relevant sub-regions.In an experimental study, we provide quantitative evidence for the increased quality of the PDPs within sub-regions.

Both feature selection and hyperparameter tuning are key tasks in machine learning. Hyperparameter tuning is often useful to increase model performance, while feature selection is undertaken to attain sparse models. Sparsity may yield better model interpretability and lower cost of data acquisition, data handling and model inference. While sparsity may have a beneficial or detrimental effect on predictive performance, a small drop in performance may be acceptable in return for a substantial gain in sparseness. We therefore treat feature selection as a multi-objective optimization task. We perform hyperparameter tuning and feature selection simultaneously because the choice of features of a model may influence what hyperparameters perform well.