VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ricardo Melo
dblp:264/2204
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3186-3752ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Design research and methods · 87% Collaborative and social computing · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Design research and methods
research ethics |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: The Value Landscape Behind Fieldwork Decisions · CHI 2026 |
Design research and methods › design ethics
values in design |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: The Value Landscape Behind Fieldwork Decisions · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
workshop study · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: The Value Landscape Behind Fieldwork DecisionsabstractFieldwork provides essential access to participants’ everyday practices, but this close engagement also exposes researchers to unpredictable ethical dilemmas. Navigating these dilemmas can be challenging for researchers because ethics principles, codes of conduct, or assessment by ethics boards do not address all fieldwork challenges that researchers might encounter. Addressing ethical dilemmas inevitably involves researchers’ own values and judgements, yet, little is known about what and how researchers’ values inform their decisions in practice. This study investigates researchers’ value enactment, drawing on four workshops with 21 participants who conduct user research fieldwork. We identified (1) a collection of values that orient researchers’ practice, extending current understandings of what values operate in design research; and (2) a set of seven questions, each anchored in a declared value that surface recurring tensions in fieldwork. Together, these insights deepen the understanding of ethical decision-making in fieldwork, supporting ethical reflection and value alignment within teams. Inês Silva, Joana Silva 0001, Francisco Nunes, Ricardo Melo |
CHI | 4 |
| 2024 | Understanding How Parents Deal With the Health Advice They Receive: A Qualitative Study and Implications for the Design of Message-based Health Dissemination Systems for Child HealthabstractMessage-based health information dissemination systems can potentially improve maternal and child health (MCH). By conveying health information to parents, SMS- and chatbot-based systems can support parents’ learning and empower them to make better health decisions for their children. However, there is limited design advice for creating message-based dissemination systems for MCH. To help address this gap, we conducted 14 participatory workshops with 42 parents from Portugal and South Africa, exploring how parents learned to care for their children’s health. Our findings showed how parents reflected on the health advice they received, by assessing the fit of the advice to their child’s characteristics, their values and beliefs, the advice’s feasibility, or the intention and competence of the advice giver. Based on these insights, we propose four design implications for creating message-based health information dissemination systems tailored to parents and their children. Beatriz Félix, Cristiana Braga, Xolani Ntinga, Sarina Till, Leina Meoli, Alastair van Heerden, Ricardo Melo, Nervo Verdezoto, Melissa Densmore, Francisco Nunes |
Conference on Designing Interactive Systems | 7 |