Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Inês Silva

dblp:264/2526 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-4323-1382ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 87% Collaborative and social computing · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
research ethics
1.012026
Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: The Value Landscape Behind Fieldwork Decisions · CHI 2026
Design research and methods › design ethics
values in design
1.012026
Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: The Value Landscape Behind Fieldwork Decisions · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workshop study · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: The Value Landscape Behind Fieldwork Decisions
abstract
Fieldwork provides essential access to participants’ everyday practices, but this close engagement also exposes researchers to unpredictable ethical dilemmas. Navigating these dilemmas can be challenging for researchers because ethics principles, codes of conduct, or assessment by ethics boards do not address all fieldwork challenges that researchers might encounter. Addressing ethical dilemmas inevitably involves researchers’ own values and judgements, yet, little is known about what and how researchers’ values inform their decisions in practice. This study investigates researchers’ value enactment, drawing on four workshops with 21 participants who conduct user research fieldwork. We identified (1) a collection of values that orient researchers’ practice, extending current understandings of what values operate in design research; and (2) a set of seven questions, each anchored in a declared value that surface recurring tensions in fieldwork. Together, these insights deepen the understanding of ethical decision-making in fieldwork, supporting ethical reflection and value alignment within teams.
Inês Silva, Joana Silva 0001, Francisco Nunes, Ricardo Melo
CHI1