VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zijian Xie
dblp:264/7482
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 65% Vision and language · 35% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Immersive interaction · 77% Usability and user experience research · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FinMMDocR: Benchmarking Financial Multimodal Reasoning with Scenario Awareness, Document Understanding, and Multi-Step Computation · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
financial multimodal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | $\mathcal{F}_{M}$ FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and Challenging · ICCV 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | FinMMDocR: Benchmarking Financial Multimodal Reasoning with Scenario Awareness, Document Understanding, and Multi-Step Computation · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 2.0multimodal learning · 1.7large language model · 1.7visual editor · 0.4in-situ visualization · 0.4heuristic metrics · 0.4data filtering · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | FinMMDocR: Benchmarking Financial Multimodal Reasoning with Scenario Awareness, Document Understanding, and Multi-Step ComputationabstractWe introduce FinMMDocR, a novel bilingual multimodal benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on real-world financial numerical reasoning. Compared to existing benchmarks, our work delivers three major advancements. (1) Scenario Awareness: 57.9% of 1,200 expert-annotated problems incorporate 12 types of implicit financial scenarios (e.g., Portfolio Management), challenging models to perform expert-level reasoning based on assumptions; (2) Document Understanding: 837 Chinese/English documents spanning 9 types (e.g., Company Research) average 50.8 pages with rich visual elements, significantly surpassing existing benchmarks in both breadth and depth of financial documents; (3) Multi-Step Computation: Problems demand 11-step reasoning on average (5.3 extraction + 5.7 calculation steps), with 65.0% requiring cross-page evidence (2.4 pages average). The best-performing MLLM achieves only 58.0% accuracy, and different retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods show significant performance variations on this task. We expect FinMMDocR to drive improvements in MLLMs and reasoning-enhanced methods on complex multimodal reasoning tasks in real-world scenarios. Zichen Tang, Haihong E, Rongjin Li, Linwei Jia, Zhuodi Hao, Zhongjun Yang, Yuanze Li, Haolin Tian, Peizhi Zhao, Xianghe Wang, Xueyuan Lin, Ruofei Bai, Zijian Xie, Ruining Cao, Haocheng Gao |
AAAI | 18 |
| 2026 | Deep reinforcement learning-based design of closed-chain legged mechanism
Jianjun Qin, Zijian Xie, Guotong Li |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 2025 | $\mathcal{F}_{M}$ FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and Challenging
Zichen Tang, Haihong E, Zhongjun Yang, Rongjin Li, Zihua Rong, Haoyang He, Zhuodi Hao, Xinyang Hu, Kun Ji, Ziyan Ma, Mengyuan Ji, Chenghao Ma, Qianhe Zheng, Zijian Xie, Shiyao Peng |
ICCV | 20 |
| 2020 | MRAT: The Mixed Reality Analytics ToolkitabstractSignificant tool support exists for the development of mixed reality (MR) applications; however, there is a lack of tools for analyzing MR experiences. We elicit requirements for future tools through interviews with 8 university research, instructional, and media teams using AR/VR in a variety of domains. While we find a common need for capturing how users perform tasks in MR, the primary differences were in terms of heuristics and metrics relevant to each project. Particularly in the early project stages, teams were uncertain about what data should, and even could, be collected with MR technologies. We designed the Mixed Reality Analytics Toolkit (MRAT) to instrument MR apps via visual editors without programming and enable rapid data collection and filtering for visualizations of MR user sessions. With MRAT, we contribute flexible interaction tracking and task definition concepts, an extensible set of heuristic techniques and metrics to measure task success, and visual inspection tools with in-situ visualizations in MR. Focusing on a multi-user, cross-device MR crisis simulation and triage training app as a case study, we then show the benefits of using MRAT, not only for user testing of MR apps, but also performance tuning throughout the design process. Michael Nebeling, Maximilian Speicher, Xizi Wang 0001, Shwetha Rajaram, Brian D. Hall, Zijian Xie, Alexander R. E. Raistrick, Michelle Aebersold, Edward G. Happ, Lotus Hanzi Zhang, Leah E. Ramsier, Rhea Kulkarni |
CHI | 6 |