Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas M. Philip

dblp:27/1768 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9879-0965ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
participatory design
0.812024
Co-design Partners as Transformative Learners: Imagining Ideal Technology for Schools by Centering Speculative Relationships · CHI 2024
Computing education
educational equity
0.212024
Co-design Partners as Transformative Learners: Imagining Ideal Technology for Schools by Centering Speculative Relationships · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

speculative design · 1.5case study · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Co-design Partners as Transformative Learners: Imagining Ideal Technology for Schools by Centering Speculative Relationships
abstract
Emergent technologies like artificial intelligence have been proposed to address issues of inequity in schools, yet tend to ossify the status quo because they address needs within an already inequitable system. In this paper, we draw from speculative participatory approaches across HCI and the learning sciences, and present a novel approach to co-design that forefronts supporting historically minoritized youth in developing transformative agency to change their schools based on their valued hopes, practices, and concerns. We argue that when co-design spaces forefront relational development, expansive technological objects emerge as a byproduct. We present a case study of expansive dreaming with U.S. historically minoritized students about the use of artificial intelligence to support classroom collaboration. Methodologically, we demonstrate how physically visiting spaces of collective agency serves as a powerful perceptual bridge to imagining joyful, equitable possibilities for schooling. Our approach yields new visions for schooling and new metaphors for artificial intelligence.
Michael Alan Chang, Richmond Y. Wong, Thomas Breideband, Thomas M. Philip, Ashieda McKoy, Arturo Cortez, Sidney K. D'Mello
CHI4