Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rosanne Siino

dblp:27/4004 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 72% Human-robot interaction · 28%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › computer-supported cooperative work
interruption handling
0.112006
Interruptions on software teams: a comparison of paired and solo programmers · CSCW 2006
Collaborative and social computing › computer-supported cooperative work › developer collaboration
pair programming
0.112006
Interruptions on software teams: a comparison of paired and solo programmers · CSCW 2006
Empirical software engineering › developer studies › developer behavior
developer work practices
0.012006
Interruptions on software teams: a comparison of paired and solo programmers · CSCW 2006
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative learning › knowledge construction
sensemaking
0.012005
Robots, Gender & Sensemaking: Sex Segregation's Impact On Workers Making Sense Of a Mobile Autonomous Robot · ICRA 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ethnographic observation · 0.1ethnographic study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Colleague vs. tool: Effects of disclosure in human-robot collaboration
abstract
We report the results of an experiment examining how an autonomous mobile robotpsilas disclosure of task versus affective information influences peoplepsilas feelings about a robot when working on a collaborative task. In a 3 times 2 experiment, we examined disclosure (task, affective and no disclosure) and the trigger that produced the disclosure (automatic vs. on-demand). We hypothesized that a robot disclosing task information would increase peoplepsilas sense of control because it provides awareness about the task situation, but that affective information would decrease peoplepsilas sense of control. We also predicted that people would like robots better when they disclose affective information. Our findings confirm that people both felt less in control and liked the robot more when the robot disclosed its affective state. We further found that providing people with the ability to control disclosure (on demand vs. automatic disclosure), increased their sense of control, but decreased their liking of the robot. This research suggests the need to weigh a potential tradeoff between designing robot collaborators that evoke perceptions of control versus liking. In the discussion, we explore design implications and how different combinations of disclosure types and triggers may optimize both feelings of control and liking in human-robot collaboration.
Rosanne Siino, J. Chung, Pamela J. Hinds
RO-MAN1
2006 Interruptions on software teams: a comparison of paired and solo programmers
abstract
This study explores interruption patterns among software developers who program in pairs versus those who program solo. Ethnographic observations indicate that interruption length, content, type, occurrence time, and interrupter and interruptee strategies differed markedly for radically collocated pair programmers versus the programmers who primarily worked alone. After presenting an analysis of 242 interruptions drawn from more than 40 hours of observation data, we discuss how team configuration and work setting influenced how and when developers handled interruptions. We then suggest ways that CSCW systems might better support pair programming and, more broadly, provide interruption-handling support for workers in knowledge-intensive occupations.
Jan Chong, Rosanne Siino
CSCW2
2005 Robots, Gender & Sensemaking: Sex Segregation's Impact On Workers Making Sense Of a Mobile Autonomous Robot
abstract
This ethnographic study suggests that social structures such as the sex segregation of jobs may impact how different groups of workers make sense of robots in their work environment. Designers may need to take such structures into account if mobile autonomous robots are to operate successfully alongside humans in the workplace.
Rosanne Siino, Pamela J. Hinds
ICRA1