Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jantzen T. Lee

dblp:274/9709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5595-1335ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Wearable and physiological sensing · 60% Health and well-being technologies · 40%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
assistive technology
0.712023
A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Active Recovery Reflexes on Stumble Recovery in a Swing-Assist Knee Prosthesis · ICRA 2023
Wearable and physiological sensing
gait analysis
0.212023
A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Active Recovery Reflexes on Stumble Recovery in a Swing-Assist Knee Prosthesis · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

swing-assist control · 1.3reflex-based control · 1.3stance-controlled swing-assist control · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Active Recovery Reflexes on Stumble Recovery in a Swing-Assist Knee Prosthesis
abstract
This paper explores the effects of a swing phase stumble recovery controller in a swing-assist prosthesis. The prosthesis detects a stumble event and employs either a lowering recovery response - wherein the user's swing is truncated, and the leg is prepared for loading- or an elevating recovery response - wherein an amplified swing flexion is employed to step over the obstacle causing the perturbation. The controller described in this paper choses which of these responses to use based on the perturbation timing within the gait cycle, where stumble events which occur prior to an estimated 35 percent of the way through swing trigger an elevating response, and later stumbles trigger a lowering response. The potential efficacy of this approach was assessed in a preliminary study with two participants with transfemoral amputation; wherein each participant's walking was perturbed in early, mid, and late swing phase when wearing both their prescribed prosthesis and the swing-assist prosthesis prototype. When wearing the swing- assist device, 0 of the 13 perturbations resulted in falls, with none of the trials being classifiable as “near falls”. Conversely, when using their prescribed device, one participant had a fall rate of 3 out of 6 perturbations, with 1 of the 3 recoveries being classifiable as a “near fall”; the second participant had a fall rate of 0 of 3 trials, with 2 of the 3 recoveries being classifiable as “near falls”. For both participants, when recovery was achieved, it was accompanied by significantly longer periods of irregularity and asymmetry in gait when using their prescribed devices, as compared to the test device. These results suggest the possibility of substantial benefit provided by a low-power, reflex- based stumble recovery feature in knee prostheses.
Jantzen T. Lee, Shane T. King, Maura Eveld, Michael Goldfarb
ICRA1
2020 Swing-Assist for Enhancing Stair Ambulation in a Primarily-Passive Knee Prosthesis
abstract
This paper presents the design and implementation of a controller for stair ascent and descent in a primarily-passive stance-controlled swing-assist (SCSA) prosthesis. The prosthesis and controller enable users to perform both step-over and step-to stair ascent and descent. The efficacy of the controller and SCSA prosthesis prototype in providing improved stair ambulation was tested on a unilateral transfemoral amputee in experiments that employed motion capture apparatus to compare joint kinematics with the SCSA prosthesis, relative to performing the same activity with a microprocessor-controlled daily-use passive prosthesis. Results suggest that the SCSA knee significantly decreases compensatory motion during stair activity when compared to the passive prosthesis.
Jantzen T. Lee, Michael Goldfarb
ICRA1