Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiangzhuo Ding

dblp:274/9828 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 93% Health and well-being technologies · 7%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 56% Deep learning architectures and training · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive gradient clipping
0.712023
CowClip: Reducing CTR Prediction Model Training Time from 12 Hours to 10 Minutes on 1 GPU · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
large-batch training
0.712023
CowClip: Reducing CTR Prediction Model Training Time from 12 Hours to 10 Minutes on 1 GPU · AAAI 2023
Recommender systems
click-through rate prediction
0.712023
CowClip: Reducing CTR Prediction Model Training Time from 12 Hours to 10 Minutes on 1 GPU · AAAI 2023
Wearable and physiological sensing
gait analysis
0.412020
Prediction of Gait Cycle Percentage Using Instrumented Shoes with Artificial Neural Networks · ICRA 2020
Wearable and physiological sensing › gait analysis
gait phase estimation
0.412020
Prediction of Gait Cycle Percentage Using Instrumented Shoes with Artificial Neural Networks · ICRA 2020
Wearable and physiological sensing › smart footwear
instrumented insole
0.412020
Prediction of Gait Cycle Percentage Using Instrumented Shoes with Artificial Neural Networks · ICRA 2020
Wearable and physiological sensing
smart footwear
0.412020
Prediction of Gait Cycle Percentage Using Instrumented Shoes with Artificial Neural Networks · ICRA 2020
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology › rehabilitation robotics
gait rehabilitation
0.112020
Prediction of Gait Cycle Percentage Using Instrumented Shoes with Artificial Neural Networks · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large-batch training · 1.3l2 regularization · 1.3column-wise clipping · 1.3recurrent networks · 0.4encoder-decoder · 0.4artificial neural network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 CowClip: Reducing CTR Prediction Model Training Time from 12 Hours to 10 Minutes on 1 GPU
abstract
The click-through rate (CTR) prediction task is to predict whether a user will click on the recommended item. As mind-boggling amounts of data are produced online daily, accelerating CTR prediction model training is critical to ensuring an up-to-date model and reducing the training cost. One approach to increase the training speed is to apply large batch training. However, as shown in computer vision and natural language processing tasks, training with a large batch easily suffers from the loss of accuracy. Our experiments show that previous scaling rules fail in the training of CTR prediction neural networks. To tackle this problem, we first theoretically show that different frequencies of ids make it challenging to scale hyperparameters when scaling the batch size. To stabilize the training process in a large batch size setting, we develop the adaptive Column-wise Clipping (CowClip). It enables an easy and effective scaling rule for the embeddings, which keeps the learning rate unchanged and scales the L2 loss. We conduct extensive experiments with four CTR prediction networks on two real-world datasets and successfully scaled 128 times the original batch size without accuracy loss. In particular, for CTR prediction model DeepFM training on the Criteo dataset, our optimization framework enlarges the batch size from 1K to 128K with over 0.1% AUC improvement and reduces training time from 12 hours to 10 minutes on a single V100 GPU. Our code locates at github.com/bytedance/LargeBatchCTR.
Zangwei Zheng, Pengtai Xu, Xuan Zou, Da Tang, Zhen Li 0026, Chenguang Xi, Leqi Zou, Xiangzhuo Ding, Fuzhao Xue, Ziheng Qin, Youlong Cheng, Yang You 0001
AAAI11
2020 Prediction of Gait Cycle Percentage Using Instrumented Shoes with Artificial Neural Networks
abstract
Gait training is widely used to treat gait abnormalities. Traditional gait measurement systems are limited to instrumented laboratories. Even though gait measurements can be made in these settings, it is challenging to estimate gait parameters robustly in real-time for gait rehabilitation, especially when walking over-ground. In this paper, we present a novel approach to track the continuous gait cycle during overground walking outside the laboratory. In this approach, we instrument standard footwear with a sensorized insole and an inertial measurement unit. Artificial neural networks are used on the raw data obtained from the insoles and IMUs to compute the continuous percentage of the gait cycle for the entire walking session. We show in this paper that when tested with novel subjects, we can predict the gait cycle with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 7.2%. The onset of each cycle can be detected within an RMSE time of 41.5 ms with a 99% detection rate. The algorithm was tested with 18840 strides collected from 24 adults. In this paper, we tested a combination of fully-connected layers, an Encoder-Decoder using convolutional layers, and recurrent layers to identify an architecture that provided the best performance.
Antonio Prado, Xiya Cao, Xiangzhuo Ding, Sunil K. Agrawal
ICRA3