Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Masoumehsadat Hosseini

dblp:278/1393 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-7610-9430ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Interaction techniques and input · 54% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 20% Human-robot interaction · 20%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › gesture input
mid-air gestures
1.422024
Controlling the Rooms: How People Prefer Using Gestures to Control Their Smart Homes · CHI 2024
Towards a Consensus Gesture Set: A Survey of Mid-Air Gestures in HCI for Maximized Agreement Across Domains · CHI 2023
Human-robot interaction › teleoperation
gesture-based robot control
0.812024
Controlling the Rooms: How People Prefer Using Gestures to Control Their Smart Homes · CHI 2024
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › smart home
smart home control
0.812024
Controlling the Rooms: How People Prefer Using Gestures to Control Their Smart Homes · CHI 2024
Empirical software engineering
systematic literature review
0.212023
Towards a Consensus Gesture Set: A Survey of Mid-Air Gestures in HCI for Maximized Agreement Across Domains · CHI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systematic literature review · 1.3agreement rate calculation · 1.3user study · 0.8bottom-up frame-based design · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Controlling the Rooms: How People Prefer Using Gestures to Control Their Smart Homes
abstract
Gesture interactions have become ubiquitous, and with increasingly reliable sensing technology we can anticipate their use in everyday environments such as smart homes. Gestures must meet users’ needs and constraints in diverse scenarios to gain widespread acceptance. Although mid-air gestures have been proposed in various user contexts, it is still unclear to what extent users want to integrate them into different scenarios in their smart homes, along with the motivations driving this desire. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether users will remain consistent in their suggestions when transitioning to alternative scenarios within a smart home. This study contributes methodologically by adapting a bottom-up frame-based design process. We offer insights into preferred devices and commands in different smart home scenarios. Using our results, we can assist in designing gestures in the smart home that are consistent with individual needs across devices and scenarios, while maximizing the reuse and transferability of gestural knowledge.
Masoumehsadat Hosseini, Heiko Müller 0002, Susanne Boll
CHI1
2024 The impacts of situational visual impairment on usability of touch screens
Masoumehsadat Hosseini, Hamid-Reza Hamidi, Shokoh Kermanshahani
Multim. Tools Appl.1
2023 Towards a Consensus Gesture Set: A Survey of Mid-Air Gestures in HCI for Maximized Agreement Across Domains
abstract
Mid-air gesture-based systems are becoming ubiquitous. Many mid-air gestures control different kinds of interactive devices, applications, and systems. They are, however, still targeted at specific devices in specific domains and are not necessarily consistent across domain boundaries. A comprehensive evaluation of the transferability of gesture vocabulary between domains is also lacking. Consequently, interaction designers cannot decide which gestures to use for which domain. In this systematic literature review, we contribute to the future research agenda in this area, based on an analysis of 172 papers. As part of our analysis, we clustered gestures according to the dimensions of an existing taxonomy to identify their common characteristics in different domains, and we investigated the extent to which existing mid-air gesture sets are consistent across different domains. We derived a consensus gesture set containing 22 gestures based on agreement rates calculation and considered their transferability across different domains.
Masoumehsadat Hosseini, Tjado Ihmels, Ziqian Chen, Marion Koelle, Heiko Müller 0002, Susanne Boll
CHI1