Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vikrant Varma
dblp:281/7099
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 46% Language models and text generation · 22% Reinforcement learning · 17% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MONA: Myopic Optimization with Non-myopic Approval Can Mitigate Multi-step Reward Hacking · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
reward hacking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MONA: Myopic Optimization with Non-myopic Approval Can Mitigate Multi-step Reward Hacking · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
sparse feature learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
myopic optimization with non-myopic approval · 1.7l1 penalty · 0.8gated sparse autoencoder · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MONA: Myopic Optimization with Non-myopic Approval Can Mitigate Multi-step Reward HackingabstractFuture advanced AI systems may learn sophisticated strategies through reinforcement learning (RL) that humans cannot understand well enough to safely evaluate. We propose a training method which avoids agents learning undesired multi-step plans that receive high reward (multi-step "reward hacks") even if humans are not able to detect that the behavior is undesired. The method, Myopic Optimization with Non-myopic Approval (MONA), works by combining short-sighted optimization with far-sighted reward. We demonstrate that MONA can prevent multi-step reward hacking that ordinary RL causes, even without being able to detect the reward hacking and without any extra information that ordinary RL does not get access to. We study MONA empirically in three settings which model different misalignment failure modes including 2-step environments with LLMs representing delegated oversight and encoded reasoning and longer-horizon gridworld environments representing sensor tampering. Sebastian Farquhar, Vikrant Varma, David Lindner, David Elson, Caleb Biddulph, Ian Goodfellow, Rohin Shah |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse AutoencodersabstractRecent work has found that sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an effective technique for unsupervised discovery of interpretable features in language models' (LMs) activations, by finding sparse, linear reconstructions of those activations. We introduce the Gated Sparse Autoencoder (Gated SAE), which achieves a Pareto improvement over training with prevailing methods. In SAEs, the L1 penalty used to encourage sparsity introduces many undesirable biases, such as shrinkage -- systematic underestimation of feature activations. The key insight of Gated SAEs is to separate the functionality of (a) determining which directions to use and (b) estimating the magnitudes of those directions: this enables us to apply the L1 penalty only to the former, limiting the scope of undesirable side effects. Through training SAEs on LMs of up to 7B parameters we find that, in typical hyper-parameter ranges, Gated SAEs solve shrinkage, are similarly interpretable, and require half as many firing features to achieve comparable reconstruction fidelity. Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith, Tom Lieberum, Vikrant Varma, János Kramár, Rohin Shah, Neel Nanda |
NeurIPS | 5 |