Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Phillip H. Daniel

dblp:285/3057 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › physical human-robot interaction
supernumerary robotic limbs
0.512021
Crawling Support Using Wearable SuperLimbs: Human-Robot Synchronization and Metabolic Cost Assessment · ICRA 2021
Human-robot interaction
wearable robot
0.512021
Crawling Support Using Wearable SuperLimbs: Human-Robot Synchronization and Metabolic Cost Assessment · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Robot manipulation
physical human-robot interaction
0.112021
Crawling Support Using Wearable SuperLimbs: Human-Robot Synchronization and Metabolic Cost Assessment · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metabolic cost assessment · 1.0dynamic modeling · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Crawling Support Using Wearable SuperLimbs: Human-Robot Synchronization and Metabolic Cost Assessment
abstract
A pair of Supernumerary Robotic Limbs (Super-Limbs) can brace the wearer’s upper body while they work at floor level, and support them during crawling. The SuperLimbs’ motion is synchronized with the operator to mimic natural human crawling. This synchronization relies on experimental data from the operator’s observed crawl. A method for predicting the phase difference between the SuperLimbs’ hand placement and the operators desired hand placement is developed and used to coordinate the SuperLimbs’ motion with the operator’s. The experimental data is also used to design the structure of the SuperLimbs to minimize their energy consumption during crawling and regulate their actuator’s temperatures.The SuperLimbs are designed to mimic the operator’s arms while they crawl, however factors such as their limited number of degrees of freedom (DoF), compared to natural limbs, and the compliance of the connection between the SuperLimbs and the operator means that the SuperLimbs’s may dynamically interact with the wearer differently from how their natural limbs do. A simple dynamic model is constructed to assess the energy consumed by the operator as they crawl with the SuperLimbs under different coordination patterns. An optimal coordination pattern is obtained from this assessment.
Phillip H. Daniel, H. Harry Asada
ICRA1
2020 Stable Crawling Policy for Wearable SuperLimbs Attached to a Human with Tuned Impedance
abstract
A control algorithm that allows a human model to crawl using a pair of supernumerary robotic limbs (SuperLimbs) is presented. The human model and SuperLimbs are coupled by a compliant harness. This work is inspired by the need for wearable robotic systems that can support workers engaged in fatiguing tasks. The walking policy is developed based on Lyapunov analysis. The volume of the region of attraction (ROA) of the system is used to quantify robustness and identify the optimal harness compliance. Simulation experiments are used to verify the performance of the algorithm. The presented formulation allows us to guarantee stable locomotion under nominal conditions and define robustness against modeling error and perturbations. This study is also the first, that the authors are aware of, to address cooperative crawling between a human and a wearable robotic system with state feedback.
Phillip H. Daniel, H. Harry Asada
IROS1