VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jayant Krishnamurthy
dblp:29/5765
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
8as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 8 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 40% Question answering and dialogue systems · 21% Segmentation and scene understanding · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Learning and educational technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
1.3 | 5 | 2017 | Neural Semantic Parsing with Type Constraints for Semi-Structured Tables · EMNLP 2017 Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User Feedback · ACL (1) 2017 Open-Vocabulary Semantic Parsing with both Distributional Statistics and Formal Knowledge · AAAI 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue understanding
conversational semantic parsing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Value-Agnostic Conversational Semantic Parsing · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › part segmentation
one-shot part segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Structured Set Matching Networks for One-Shot Part Labeling · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › part parsing
part labeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Structured Set Matching Networks for One-Shot Part Labeling · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
set matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Structured Set Matching Networks for One-Shot Part Labeling · CVPR 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity linking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Neural Semantic Parsing with Type Constraints for Semi-Structured Tables · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Open-Vocabulary Semantic Parsing with both Distributional Statistics and Formal Knowledge · AAAI 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
neural semantic parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User Feedback · ACL (1) 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › multimodal question answering
embodied question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing to Probabilistic Programs for Situated Question Answering · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic programming
probabilistic program semantics |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing to Probabilistic Programs for Situated Question Answering · EMNLP 2016 |
Learning and educational technologies › pedagogical agents
teachable agent |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Instructable Intelligent Personal Agent · AAAI 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
never-ending learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology › ontology evolution
ontology extension |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
web information extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Incorporating Vector Space Similarity in Random Walk Inference over Knowledge Bases · EMNLP 2014 |
Knowledge graphs › link prediction
random walk inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Incorporating Vector Space Similarity in Random Walk Inference over Knowledge Bases · EMNLP 2014 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Weakly Supervised Training of Semantic Parsers · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
diagram understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Structured Set Matching Networks for One-Shot Part Labeling · CVPR 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
distributional semantics |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Open-Vocabulary Semantic Parsing with both Distributional Statistics and Formal Knowledge · AAAI 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Neural Semantic Parsing with Type Constraints for Semi-Structured Tables · EMNLP 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
background knowledge |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing to Probabilistic Programs for Situated Question Answering · EMNLP 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Joint Syntactic and Semantic Parsing with Combinatory Categorial Grammar · ACL (1) 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value-agnostic parsing · 0.5structured prediction · 0.3global normalization · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3weak supervision · 0.3user feedback · 0.3semantic parsing · 0.3formal knowledge base integration · 0.3encoder-decoder neural network · 0.3distributional statistics · 0.3natural language interaction · 0.2lexicon induction · 0.2random walk · 0.2distributional similarity · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Value-Agnostic Conversational Semantic ParsingabstractEmmanouil Antonios Platanios, Adam Pauls, Subhro Roy, Yuchen Zhang, Alexander Kyte, Alan Guo, Sam Thomson, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Jason Wolfe, Jacob Andreas, Dan Klein. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Emmanouil A. Platanios, Adam Pauls, Subhro Roy, Yuchen Zhang 0002, Alexander Kyte, Alan Guo, Sam Thomson, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Jason Andrew Wolfe, Jacob Andreas, Daniel Klein 0001 |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 8 |
| 2020 | An agent for learning new natural language commands
Amos Azaria, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Igor Labutov, Tom M. Mitchell |
Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst. | 3 |
| 2020 | Task-Oriented Dialogue as Dataflow SynthesisabstractWe describe an approach to task-oriented dialogue in which dialogue state is represented as a dataflow graph. A dialogue agent maps each user utterance to a program that extends this graph. Programs include metacomputation operators for reference and revision that reuse dataflow fragments from previous turns. Our graph-based state enables the expression and manipulation of complex user intents, and explicit metacomputation makes these intents easier for learned models to predict. We introduce a new dataset, SMCalFlow, featuring complex dialogues about events, weather, places, and people. Experiments show that dataflow graphs and metacomputation substantially improve representability and predictability in these natural dialogues. Additional experiments on the MultiWOZ dataset show that our dataflow representation enables an otherwise off-the-shelf sequence-to-sequence model to match the best existing task-specific state tracking model. The SMCalFlow dataset, code for replicating experiments, and a public leaderboard are available at https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/dataflow-based-dialogue-semantic-machines . Jacob Andreas, John Bufe, David Burkett, Josh Clausman, Jean Crawford, Kate Crim, Jordan DeLoach, Leah Dorner, Jason Eisner, Hao Fang 0002, Alan Guo, David Hall 0006, Kristin Hayes, Kellie Hill, Diana Ho, Wendy Iwaszuk, Smriti Jha, Daniel Klein 0001, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Theo Lanman, Percy Liang, Christopher H. Lin, Ilya Lintsbakh, Andy McGovern, Aleksandr Nisnevich, Adam Pauls, Dmitrij Petters, Brent Read, Dan Roth 0001, Subhro Roy, Jesse Rusak, Beth Short, Div Slomin, Ben Snyder, Stephon Striplin, Yu Su 0001, Zachary Tellman, Sam Thomson, Andrei Vorobev, Izabela Witoszko, Jason Andrew Wolfe, Abby Wray, Yuchen Zhang 0002, Alexander Zotov |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 20 |
| 2018 | Structured Set Matching Networks for One-Shot Part LabelingabstractDiagrams often depict complex phenomena and serve as a good test bed for visual and textual reasoning. However, understanding diagrams using natural image understanding approaches requires large training datasets of diagrams, which are very hard to obtain. Instead, this can be addressed as a matching problem either between labeled diagrams, images or both. This problem is very challenging since the absence of significant color and texture renders local cues ambiguous and requires global reasoning. We consider the problem of one-shot part labeling: labeling multiple parts of an object in a target image given only a single source image of that category. For this set-to-set matching problem, we introduce the Structured Set Matching Network (SSMN), a structured prediction model that incorporates convolutional neural networks. The SSMN is trained using global normalization to maximize local match scores between corresponding elements and a global consistency score among all matched elements, while also enforcing a matching constraint between the two sets. The SSMN significantly outperforms several strong baselines on three label transfer scenarios: diagram-to-diagram, evaluated on a new diagram dataset of over 200 categories; image-to-image, evaluated on a dataset built on top of the Pascal Part Dataset; and image-to-diagram, evaluated on transferring labels across these datasets. Jayant Krishnamurthy, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Ali Farhadi |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2017 | Open-Vocabulary Semantic Parsing with both Distributional Statistics and Formal KnowledgeabstractTraditional semantic parsers map language onto compositional, executable queries in a fixed schema. This mapping allows them to effectively leverage the information contained in large, formal knowledge bases (KBs, e.g., Freebase) to answer questions, but it is also fundamentally limiting---these semantic parsers can only assign meaning to language that falls within the KB's manually-produced schema. Recently proposed methods for open vocabulary semantic parsing overcome this limitation by learning execution models for arbitrary language, essentially using a text corpus as a kind of knowledge base. However, all prior approaches to open vocabulary semantic parsing replace a formal KB with textual information, making no use of the KB in their models. We show how to combine the disparate representations used by these two approaches, presenting for the first time a semantic parser that (1) produces compositional, executable representations of language, (2) can successfully leverage the information contained in both a formal KB and a large corpus, and (3) is not limited to the schema of the underlying KB. We demonstrate significantly improved performance over state-of-the-art baselines on an open-domain natural language question answering task. Matt Gardner 0001, Jayant Krishnamurthy |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2017 | Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User FeedbackabstractSrinivasan Iyer, Ioannis Konstas, Alvin Cheung, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Luke Zettlemoyer. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2017. Srinivasan Iyer 0001, Ioannis Konstas, Alvin Cheung, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Luke Zettlemoyer |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2017 | Neural Semantic Parsing with Type Constraints for Semi-Structured TablesabstractWe present a new semantic parsing model for answering compositional questions on semi-structured Wikipedia tables.Our parser is an encoder-decoder neural network with two key technical innovations:(1) a grammar for the decoder that only generates well-typed logical forms; and(2) an entity embedding and linking module that identifies entity mentions while generalizing across tables.We also introduce a novel method for training our neural model with question-answer supervision.On the WIKITABLEQUESTIONS data set, our parser achieves a state-of-theart accuracy of 43.3% for a single model and 45.9% for a 5-model ensemble, improving on the best prior score of 38.7% set by a 15-model ensemble.These results suggest that type constraints and entity linking are valuable components to incorporate in neural semantic parsers. Jayant Krishnamurthy, Pradeep Dasigi, Matt Gardner 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2016 | Instructable Intelligent Personal AgentabstractUnlike traditional machine learning methods, humans often learn from natural language instruction. As users become increasingly accustomed to interacting with mobile devices using speech, their interest in instructing these devices in natural language is likely to grow. We introduce our Learning by Instruction Agent (LIA), an intelligent personal agent that users can teach to perform new action sequences to achieve new commands, using solely natural language interaction. LIA uses a CCG semantic parser to ground the semantics of each command in terms of primitive executable procedures defining sensors and effectors of the agent. Given a natural language command that LIA does not understand, it prompts the user to explain how to achieve the command through a sequence of steps, also specified in natural language. A novel lexicon induction algorithm enables LIA to generalize across taught commands, e.g., having been taught how to "forward an email to Alice," LIA can correctly interpret the command "forward this email to Bob." A user study involving email tasks demonstrates that users voluntarily teach LIA new commands, and that these taught commands significantly reduce task completion time. These results demonstrate the potential of natural language instruction as a significant, under-explored paradigm for machine learning. Amos Azaria, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Tom M. Mitchell |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2016 | Semantic Parsing to Probabilistic Programs for Situated Question AnsweringabstractSituated question answering is the problem of answering questions about an environment such as an image or diagram.This problem requires jointly interpreting a question and an environment using background knowledge to select the correct answer.We present Parsing to Probabilistic Programs (P 3 ), a novel situated question answering model that can use background knowledge and global features of the question/environment interpretation while retaining efficient approximate inference.Our key insight is to treat semantic parses as probabilistic programs that execute nondeterministically and whose possible executions represent environmental uncertainty.We evaluate our approach on a new, publicly-released data set of 5000 science diagram questions, outperforming several competitive classical and neural baselines. Jayant Krishnamurthy, Oyvind Tafjord, Aniruddha Kembhavi |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2016 | Probabilistic Models for Learning a Semantic Parser LexiconabstractWe introduce several probabilistic models for learning the lexicon of a semantic parser. Lexicon learning is the first step of training a semantic parser for a new application domain and the quality of the learned lexicon significantly affects both the accuracy and efficiency of the final semantic parser. Existing work on lexicon learning has focused on heuristic methods that lack convergence guarantees and require significant human input in the form of lexicon templates or annotated logical forms. In contrast, our probabilistic models are trained directly from question/answer pairs using EM and our simplest model has a concave objective that guarantees convergence to a global optimum. An experimental evaluation on a set of 4th grade science questions demonstrates that our models improve semantic parser accuracy (35-70% error reduction) and efficiency (4-25x more sentences per second) relative to prior work despite using less human input. Our models also obtain competitive results on GEO880 without any datasetspecific engineering. Jayant Krishnamurthy |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2015 | Never-Ending LearningabstractWhereas people learn many different types of knowledge from diverse experiences over many years, most current machine learning systems acquire just a single function or data model from just a single data set. We propose a never-ending learning paradigm for machine learning, to better reflect the more ambitious and encompassing type of learning performed by humans. As a case study, we describe the Never-Ending Language Learner (NELL), which achieves some of the desired properties of a never-ending learner, and we discuss lessons learned. NELL has been learning to read the web 24 hours/day since January 2010, and so far has acquired a knowledge base with over 80 million confidence-weighted beliefs (e.g., servedWith(tea, biscuits)). NELL has also learned millions of features and parameters that enable it to read these beliefs from the web. Additionally, it has learned to reason over these beliefs to infer new beliefs, and is able to extend its ontology by synthesizing new relational predicates. NELL can be tracked online at http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu, and followed on Twitter at @CMUNELL. Tom M. Mitchell, William W. Cohen, Estevam Hruschka, Partha P. Talukdar, Justin Betteridge, Andrew Carlson, Bhavana Dalvi, Matt Gardner 0001, Bryan Kisiel, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Ni Lao, Kathryn Mazaitis, Thahir Mohamed, Ndapandula Nakashole, Emmanouil A. Platanios, Alan Ritter, Mehdi Samadi, Burr Settles, Richard C. Wang, Derry Wijaya, Abhinav Gupta 0001, Xinlei Chen, Abulhair Saparov, Malcolm Greaves, Joel Welling |
AAAI | 10 |
| 2015 | Learning a Compositional Semantics for Freebase with an Open Predicate VocabularyabstractWe present an approach to learning a model-theoretic semantics for natural language tied to Freebase. Crucially, our approach uses an open predicate vocabulary, enabling it to produce denotations for phrases such as “Republican front-runner from Texas” whose semantics cannot be represented using the Freebase schema. Our approach directly converts a sentence’s syntactic CCG parse into a logical form containing predicates derived from the words in the sentence, assigning each word a consistent semantics across sentences. This logical form is evaluated against a learned probabilistic database that defines a distribution over denotations for each textual predicate. A training phase produces this probabilistic database using a corpus of entity-linked text and probabilistic matrix factorization with a novel ranking objective function. We evaluate our approach on a compositional question answering task where it outperforms several competitive baselines. We also compare our approach against manually annotated Freebase queries, finding that our open predicate vocabulary enables us to answer many questions that Freebase cannot. Jayant Krishnamurthy, Tom M. Mitchell |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2014 | Joint Syntactic and Semantic Parsing with Combinatory Categorial GrammarabstractWe present an approach to training a joint syntactic and semantic parser that combines syntactic training information from CCGbank with semantic training information from a knowledge base via distant supervision. The trained parser produces a full syntactic parse of any sentence, while simultaneously producing logical forms for portions of the sentence that have a semantic representation within the parser’s predicate vocabulary. We demonstrate our approach by training a parser whose semantic representation contains 130 predicates from the NELL ontology. A semantic evaluation demonstrates that this parser produces logical forms better than both comparable prior work and a pipelined syntax-then-semantics approach. A syntactic evaluation on CCGbank demonstrates that the parser’s dependency Fscore is within 2.5% of state-of-the-art. Jayant Krishnamurthy, Tom M. Mitchell |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2014 | Incorporating Vector Space Similarity in Random Walk Inference over Knowledge BasesabstractMuch work in recent years has gone into the construction of large knowledge bases (KBs), such as Freebase, DBPedia, NELL, and YAGO.While these KBs are very large, they are still very incomplete, necessitating the use of inference to fill in gaps.Prior work has shown how to make use of a large text corpus to augment random walk inference over KBs.We present two improvements to the use of such large corpora to augment KB inference.First, we present a new technique for combining KB relations and surface text into a single graph representation that is much more compact than graphs used in prior work.Second, we describe how to incorporate vector space similarity into random walk inference over KBs, reducing the feature sparsity inherent in using surface text.This allows us to combine distributional similarity with symbolic logical inference in novel and effective ways.With experiments on many relations from two separate KBs, we show that our methods significantly outperform prior work on KB inference, both in the size of problem our methods can handle and in the quality of predictions made. Matt Gardner 0001, Partha P. Talukdar, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Tom M. Mitchell |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2013 | Jointly Learning to Parse and Perceive: Connecting Natural Language to the Physical WorldabstractThis paper introduces Logical Semantics with Perception (LSP), a model for grounded language acquisition that learns to map natural language statements to their referents in a physical environment. For example, given an image, LSP can map the statement “blue mug on the table” to the set of image segments showing blue mugs on tables. LSP learns physical representations for both categorical (“blue,” “mug”) and relational (“on”) language, and also learns to compose these representations to produce the referents of entire statements. We further introduce a weakly supervised training procedure that estimates LSP’s parameters using annotated referents for entire statements, without annotated referents for individual words or the parse structure of the statement. We perform experiments on two applications: scene understanding and geographical question answering. We find that LSP outperforms existing, less expressive models that cannot represent relational language. We further find that weakly supervised training is competitive with fully supervised training while requiring significantly less annotation effort. Jayant Krishnamurthy, Thomas Kollar |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2012 | Weakly Supervised Training of Semantic Parsers
Jayant Krishnamurthy, Tom M. Mitchell |
EMNLP-CoNLL | 1 |
| 2011 | Which Noun Phrases Denote Which Concepts?
Jayant Krishnamurthy, Tom M. Mitchell |
ACL | 1 |
| 2009 | An interface for targeted collection of common sense knowledge using a mixture modelabstractWe present a game-based interface for acquiring common sense knowledge. In addition to being interactive and entertaining, our interface guides the knowledge acquisition process to learn about the most salient characteristics of a particular concept. We use statistical classification methods to discover the most informative characteristics in the Open Mind Common Sense knowledge base, and use these characteristics to play a game of 20 Questions with the user. Our interface also allows users to enter knowledge more quickly than a more traditional knowledge-acquisition interface. An evaluation showed that users enjoyed the game and that it increased the speed of knowledge acquisition. Robyn Speer, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Catherine Havasi, Dustin Arthur Smith, Henry Lieberman, Kenneth C. Arnold |
IUI | 2 |