Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Songtao Fang

dblp:299/5195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-7713-0415ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
e-commerce search
1.012026
Generative Retrieval for E?commerce: Jointly Learning Embedding and Codebook with Same Product Cluster · WWW 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models
generative retrieval
1.012026
Generative Retrieval for E?commerce: Jointly Learning Embedding and Codebook with Same Product Cluster · WWW 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
concept extraction
0.512021
Guided Attention Network for Concept Extraction · IJCAI 2021
Learning and educational technologies › student modeling
cognitive diagnosis
0.512021
Group-Level Cognitive Diagnosis: A Multi-Task Learning Perspective · ICDM 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

product clustering · 1.0neural interaction modeling · 0.5multi-task learning · 0.5context-aware attention · 0.5conditional random field · 0.5attention network · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Generative Retrieval for E?commerce: Jointly Learning Embedding and Codebook with Same Product Cluster
Songtao Fang, Shaowei Wei, Zhuojun Wang
WWW1
2021 Group-Level Cognitive Diagnosis: A Multi-Task Learning Perspective
abstract
Most cognitive diagnosis research in education has been concentrated on individual assessment, aiming at discovering the latent characteristics of students. However, in many real-world scenarios, group-level assessment is an important and meaningful task, e.g., class assessment in different regions can discover the difference of teaching level in different contexts. In this work, we consider assessing cognitive ability for a group of students, which aims to mine groups’ proficiency on specific knowledge concepts. The significant challenge in this task is the sparsity of group-exercise response data, which seriously affects the assessment performance. Existing works either do not make effective use of additional student-exercise response data or fail to reasonably model the relationship between group ability and individual ability in different learning contexts, resulting in sub-optimal diagnosis results. To this end, we propose a general Multi-Task based Group-Level Cognitive Diagnosis (MGCD) framework, which is featured with three special designs: 1) We jointly model student-exercise responses and group-exercise responses in a multi-task manner to alleviate the sparsity of group-exercise responses; 2) We design a context-aware attention network to model the relationship between student knowledge state and group knowledge state in different contexts; 3) We model an interpretable cognitive layer to obtain student ability, group ability and exercise factors (e.g., difficulty), and then we leverage neural networks to learn complex interaction functions among them. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the generality of MGCD and the effectiveness of our attention design and multi-task learning.
Jie Huang 0024, Qi Liu 0003, Fei Wang 0063, Zhenya Huang, Songtao Fang, Runze Wu 0001, Enhong Chen, Yu Su 0002, Shijin Wang 0001
ICDM5
2021 Guided Attention Network for Concept Extraction
abstract
Concept extraction aims to find words or phrases describing a concept from massive texts. Recently, researchers propose many neural network-based methods to automatically extract concepts. Although these methods for this task show promising results, they ignore structured information in the raw textual data (e.g., title, topic, and clue words). In this paper, we propose a novel model, named Guided Attention Concept Extraction Network (GACEN), which uses title, topic, and clue words as additional supervision to provide guidance directly. Specifically, GACEN comprises two attention networks, one of them is to gather the relevant title and topic information for each context word in the document. The other one aims to model the implicit connection between informative words (clue words) and concepts. Finally, we aggregate information from two networks as input to Conditional Random Field (CRF) to model dependencies in the output. We collected clue words for three well-studied datasets. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our model outperforms the baseline models with a large margin, especially when the labeled data is insufficient.
Songtao Fang, Zhenya Huang, Shiwei Tong, Xiaoqing Huang, Ye Liu 0011, Jie Huang 0024, Qi Liu 0003
IJCAI1