Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Minjing Shi

dblp:308/1360 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 50% Human-AI interaction · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Learning and educational technologies
intelligent tutoring systems
1.012026
Tackling the Root of Misinformation by Teaching Laypeople about Logical Fallacies via Socratic Questioning and Critical Argumentation · ACL (1) 2026
Human-AI interaction › large language model interaction
LLM-based tutoring
1.012026
Tackling the Root of Misinformation by Teaching Laypeople about Logical Fallacies via Socratic Questioning and Critical Argumentation · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › argument mining
claim detection
0.812024
AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
data annotation
0.812024
AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
LLM-based annotation
0.812024
AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

socratic questioning · 1.0large language model · 1.0critical argumentation · 1.0large language model annotation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Tackling the Root of Misinformation by Teaching Laypeople about Logical Fallacies via Socratic Questioning and Critical Argumentation
abstract
Identifying logical fallacies in everyday discourse is challenging for many people.This challenge is amplified in the era of Large Language Models (LLMs), where malicious agents can deploy fallacious arguments to disseminate misinformation at scale.In this work, we explore the potential of LLMs as part of the solution.We introduce LFTutor, an intelligent tutoring system which uses LLMs to tutor laypeople and help them learn about logical fallacies.LFTutor integrates intent-driven Socratic questioning and critical argumentation principles to actively engage learners to reflect on their reasoning.Through both automatic and human evaluations, we demonstrate that LFTutor significantly outperforms baseline LLMs lacking these pedagogical strategies.This work highlights the promise of combining LLMs with pedagogical scaffolding to foster critical thinking and argument literacy in the age of AI.ing university students' ability to recognize argument structures and fallacies.
Minjing Shi, Junling Wang 0001, Jingwei Ni, Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, Mrinmaya Sachan
ACL (1)1
2024 AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators
abstract
Jingwei Ni, Minjing Shi, Dominik Stammbach, Mrinmaya Sachan, Elliott Ash, Markus Leippold. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Jingwei Ni, Minjing Shi, Dominik Stammbach, Mrinmaya Sachan, Elliott Ash, Markus Leippold
ACL (1)2