Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gaël Gendron

dblp:310/1562 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2457-934XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 34% Reinforcement learning · 18% Language models and text generation · 16%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
1.522024
Causal Graph Modeling with Deep Neural Engines for Strong Abstract Reasoning in Language and Vision · IJCAI 2024
Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms? · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › re-identification
animal re-identification
1.012026
Recurrence over Video Frames (RoVF) for Animal Re-identification · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
abstract reasoning
1.022024
Large Language Models Are Not Strong Abstract Reasoners · IJCAI 2024
Causal Graph Modeling with Deep Neural Engines for Strong Abstract Reasoning in Language and Vision · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning
0.912025
Trust Region Reward Optimization and Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization Algorithm · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward maximization
0.912025
Trust Region Reward Optimization and Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization Algorithm · NeurIPS 2025
Learning and educational technologies › educational feedback
automated feedback
0.912025
Exploring Iterative Enhancement for Improving Learnersourced Multiple-Choice Question Explanations with Large Language Models · AAAI 2025
Learning and educational technologies › educational content generation
learnersourcing
0.912025
Exploring Iterative Enhancement for Improving Learnersourced Multiple-Choice Question Explanations with Large Language Models · AAAI 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
independent mechanisms
0.812024
Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms? · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
language model architecture
0.812024
Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms? · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.812024
Large Language Models Are Not Strong Abstract Reasoners · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
disentanglement
0.712023
Disentanglement of Latent Representations via Causal Interventions · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization
0.212024
Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms? · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
vector-quantized variational autoencoder
0.212023
Disentanglement of Latent Representations via Causal Interventions · IJCAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recurrent neural network · 1.0perceiver transformer · 1.0SAM2 · 1.0DINOv2 · 1.0trust region optimization · 0.9preference learning · 0.9minorization-maximization · 0.9large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9energy-based modeling · 0.9sparse module interaction · 0.8deep neural network · 0.8causal modeling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Recurrence over Video Frames (RoVF) for Animal Re-identification
abstract
Abstract Recent advances in deep learning have greatly enhanced the accuracy and scalability of animal re-identification by automating the extraction of subtle distinguishing features from images and videos. This enables large-scale, non-invasive monitoring of animal populations. This article proposes a segmentation pipeline and a re-identification model to identify animals without ground-truth IDs. The segmentation pipeline isolates animals from the background using bounding boxes and leverages the DINOv2 and Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) foundation models. For re-identification, Recurrence over Video Frames (RoVF) is introduced, a novel approach that employs a recurrent component based on the Perceiver transformer atop a DINOv2 image model, iteratively refining embeddings from video frames. The proposed methods are evaluated on video datasets of meerkats and polar bears (PolarBearVidID). The proposed segmentation model achieved high accuracy (94.36% and 97.26%) and IoU (73.14% and 92.77%) for meerkats and polar bears, respectively. RoVF outperformed frame- and video-based re-identification baselines, achieving a top-1 accuracy of 46.5% and 55% on masked test sets for meerkats and polar bears, respectively, as well as higher top-3 accuracy. These results highlight the potential of the proposed approach to reduce annotation burdens in future individual-based ecological studies. The code is available at https://github.com/Strong-AI-Lab/RoVF-Meerkat-Reidentification .
Mitchell Rogers, Kobe Knowles, Gaël Gendron, Shahrokh Heidari, Isla Duporge, David Arturo Soriano Valdez, Mihailo Azhar, Padriac O'Leary, Simon Eyre, Michael Witbrock, Patrice Delmas
Int. J. Comput. Vis.3
2025 Exploring Iterative Enhancement for Improving Learnersourced Multiple-Choice Question Explanations with Large Language Models
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in language understanding and generation, and their potential in educational contexts is increasingly being explored. One promising area is learnersourcing, where students engage in creating their own educational content, such as multiple-choice questions. A critical step in this process is generating effective explanations for the solutions to these questions, as such explanations aid in peer understanding and promote deeper conceptual learning. However, students often find it difficult to craft high-quality explanations due to limited understanding or gaps in their subject knowledge. To support this task, we introduce ``ILearner-LLM,'' a framework that uses iterative enhancement with LLMs to improve generated explanations. The framework combines an explanation generation model and an explanation evaluation model fine-tuned using student preferences for quality, where feedback from the evaluation model is fed back into the generation model to refine the output. Our experiments with LLaMA2-13B and GPT-4 using five large datasets from the PeerWise MCQ platform show that ILearner-LLM produces explanations of higher quality that closely align with those written by students. Our findings represent a promising approach for enriching the learnersourcing experience for students and for leveraging the capabilities of large language models for educational applications.
Qiming Bao 0001, Juho Leinonen 0001, Alex Yuxuan Peng, Wanjun Zhong, Gaël Gendron, Timothy Pistotti, Alice Huang, Paul Denny 0001, Michael Witbrock, Jiamou Liu
AAAI5
2025 Analysis of Long-Term Player Action Prediction Performance Based on Causal Modelling in Rugby League
Ruigeng Wang, Shahrokh Heidari, David Arturo Soriano Valdez, Mitchell Rogers, Gaël Gendron, Yani He, Nicolas Mir, Yalu Zou, Riki Mitchel, Alfonso Gastelum Strozzi, Marcel Noronha, Michael Witbrock, Patrice Delmas
ACIVS6
2025 Trust Region Reward Optimization and Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization Algorithm
abstract
Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) learns a reward function to explain expert demonstrations. Modern IRL methods often use the adversarial (minimax) formulation that alternates between reward and policy optimization, which often lead to {\em unstable} training. Recent non-adversarial IRL approaches improve stability by jointly learning reward and policy via energy-based formulations but lack formal guarantees. This work bridges this gap. We first present a *unified* view showing canonical non-adversarial methods explicitly or implicitly maximize the likelihood of expert behavior, which is equivalent to minimizing the expected return gap. This insight leads to our main contribution: *Trust Region Reward Optimization* (TRRO), a framework that guarantees *monotonic* improvement in this likelihood via a Minorization-Maximization process. We instantiate TRRO into *Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization* (PIRO), a practical and stable IRL algorithm. Theoretically, TRRO provides the IRL counterpart to the stability guarantees of Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) in forward RL. Empirically, PIRO matches or surpasses state-of-the-art baselines in reward recovery, policy imitation with high sample efficiency on MuJoCo and Gym-Robotics benchmarks and a real-world animal behavior modeling task.
Yang Chen 0028, Menglin Zou, Yitan Zhang, Gaël Gendron, Libo Zhang 0006, Jiamou Liu, Michael Witbrock
NeurIPS6
2024 Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms?
abstract
Despite impressive performance on language modelling and complex reasoning tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) fall short on the same tasks in uncommon settings or with distribution shifts, exhibiting a lack of generalisation ability.By contrast, systems such as causal models, that learn abstract variables and causal relationships, can demonstrate increased robustness against changes in the distribution.One reason for this success is the existence and use of Independent Causal Mechanisms (ICMs) representing high-level concepts that only sparsely interact.In this work, we apply two concepts from causality to learn ICMs within LLMs.We develop a new LLM architecture composed of multiple sparsely interacting language modelling modules.We show that such causal constraints can improve out-ofdistribution performance on abstract and causal reasoning tasks.We also investigate the level of independence and domain specialisation and show that LLMs rely on pre-trained partially domain-invariant mechanisms resilient to finetuning.
Gaël Gendron, Bao Trung Nguyen, Alex Yuxuan Peng, Michael Witbrock, Gillian Dobbie
EMNLP1
2024 Assessing and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Language Models with Task Structure Variations for Logical Reasoning
Qiming Bao 0001, Gaël Gendron, Alex Yuxuan Peng, Wanjun Zhong, Neset Tan, Yang Chen 0028, Michael Witbrock, Jiamou Liu
ICONIP (10)2
2024 Large Language Models Are Not Strong Abstract Reasoners
Gaël Gendron, Qiming Bao 0001, Michael Witbrock, Gillian Dobbie
IJCAI1
2024 Causal Graph Modeling with Deep Neural Engines for Strong Abstract Reasoning in Language and Vision
Gaël Gendron
IJCAI1
2023 Disentanglement of Latent Representations via Causal Interventions
abstract
The process of generating data such as images is controlled by independent and unknown factors of variation. The retrieval of these variables has been studied extensively in the disentanglement, causal representation learning, and independent component analysis fields. Recently, approaches merging these domains together have shown great success. Instead of directly representing the factors of variation, the problem of disentanglement can be seen as finding the interventions on one image that yield a change to a single factor. Following this assumption, we introduce a new method for disentanglement inspired by causal dynamics that combines causality theory with vector-quantized variational autoencoders. Our model considers the quantized vectors as causal variables and links them in a causal graph. It performs causal interventions on the graph and generates atomic transitions affecting a unique factor of variation in the image. We also introduce a new task of action retrieval that consists of finding the action responsible for the transition between two images. We test our method on standard synthetic and real-world disentanglement datasets. We show that it can effectively disentangle the factors of variation and perform precise interventions on high-level semantic attributes of an image without affecting its quality, even with imbalanced data distributions.
Gaël Gendron, Michael Witbrock, Gillian Dobbie
IJCAI1