Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dana Habeeb

dblp:319/4090 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1808-4102ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Design research and methods · 64% Wearable and physiological sensing · 36%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
participatory design
1.012026
Publics, Place, and Sensors: Co-Designing Environmental Monitoring with a Community Orchard · CHI 2026
Environmental and earth informatics
environmental monitoring
0.312026
Publics, Place, and Sensors: Co-Designing Environmental Monitoring with a Community Orchard · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 1.1sensor validation · 1.1participatory design workshops · 1.0participatory design workshop · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Publics, Place, and Sensors: Co-Designing Environmental Monitoring with a Community Orchard
abstract
Climate change is intensifying extreme heat, prompting cities to deploy environmental sensor networks to capture hyperlocal conditions. However, top-down deployments that produce data without public input often fail to align with community needs. This paper presents a participatory design study of a high-density environmental sensor network co-developed with a volunteer-run community orchard as part of a city-wide system for heat resilience. Through two participatory design workshops, orchard volunteers acted as co-designers by collaboratively defining the network’s purpose, selecting sensor locations, and identifying key environmental data outputs. The workshops functioned as sites of infrastructuring—building relationships, technical literacy, and shared understanding—while situating environmental data within the orchard’s place-based practices of stewardship. From this process, we derive design criteria for community-driven sensor networks that prioritize both technical function and public formation. These contributions extend participatory design approaches in HCI and offer guidance for future deployments of environmental sensing technologies in community and urban agriculture contexts.
Dana Habeeb, Lavanya Subramanian, Rahul Devajji, Nick Polak
CHI1
2022 Investigating and Validating On-body Temperature Sensors for Personal Heat Exposure Tracking
abstract
Individuals and communities around the world are increasingly exposed to extreme heat as a result of climate change. Urban residents are particularly vulnerable to extreme heat due to the urban heat island effect. However, understanding an individual’s heat exposure and risk is difficult to assess due to variations in temperature within an urban environment. In this paper, we examine the potential for wearable temperature sensors to accurately measure personal heat exposure. We synthesize literature from fields spanning urban planning to public health and present the results of a user study validating a set of four commonly used off-the-shelf temperature sensors in two different urban settings across five on-body locations. Our investigation found that wearable temperature sensors are less reliable in highly urban areas and when worn in direct sunlight. We discuss important design considerations for wearable temperature sensors and identify actionable ways to improve future studies.
Dana Habeeb, James Clawson, Arash Zakeresfahani, Zebulon Holtz
CHI1