Augmented reality (AR) devices with head mounted displays (HMDs) facilitate direct superimposition of 3D preoperative imaging data onto the patient during surgery. To use an HMD-AR device as a stand-alone surgical navigation system, the device should be able to locate the patient and surgical instruments, align preoperative imaging data with the patient, and visualize navigation data during surgery. Whereas some of the technologies required for this are known, integration in such devices is cumbersome and requires specific knowledge and expertise, hampering scientific progress in this field. This work therefore aims to present and evaluate an integrated HMD-based AR surgical navigation framework that is adaptable to diverse surgical applications. The framework tracks 2D patterns as reference markers attached to the patient and surgical instruments. It allows for the calibration of surgical tools using pivot and reference-based calibration techniques. It enables image-to-patient registration using point-based matching and manual positioning. The integrated functionalities of the framework are evaluated on two HMD devices, the HoloLens 2 and Magic Leap 2, with two surgical use cases being evaluated in a phantom setup: AR-guided needle insertion and rib fracture localization. The framework was able to achieve a mean tooltip calibration accuracy of 1 mm, a registration accuracy of 3 mm, and a targeting accuracy below 5 mm on the two surgical use cases. The framework presents an easy-to-use configurable tool for HMD-based AR surgical navigation, which can be extended and adapted to many surgical applications.

Augmented reality (AR) has shown potential in computer-aided surgery. It allows for the visualization of hidden anatomical structures as well as assists in navigating and locating surgical instruments at the surgical site. Various modalities (devices and/or visualizations) have been used in the literature, but few studies investigated the adequacy/superiority of one modality over the other. For instance, the use of optical see-through (OST) HMDs has not always been scientifically justified. Our goal is to compare various visualization modalities for catheter insertion in external ventricular drain and ventricular shunt procedures. We investigate two AR approaches: (1) 2D approaches consisting of a smartphone and a 2D window visualized through an OST (Microsoft HoloLens 2), and (2) 3D approaches consisting of a fully aligned patient model and a model that is adjacent to the patient and is rotationally aligned using an OST. 32 participants joined this study. For each visualization approach, participants were asked to perform five insertions after which they filled NASA-TLX and SUS forms. Moreover, the position and orientation of the needle with respect to the planning during the insertion task were collected. The results show that participants achieved a better insertion performance significantly under 3D visualizations, and the NASA-TLX and SUS forms reflected the preference of participants for these approaches compared to 2D approaches.