Individuals with tetraplegia have their independence and quality of life severely affected. Assistive robotic arms can enhance their autonomy, but effective control interfaces are essential for optimizing their usability and performance. This study aims to evaluate the performance and user experience of three control interfaces for an assistive robotic arm: Graphical User Interfaces (GUI), Embedded Interface, and Directional Gaze. Thirty-three able-bodied participants were recruited to control an assistive robotic arm through the three different interfaces in a between-subjects experiment. Performance was measured using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley (YCB) Block Pick and Place Protocol. Usability (SUS) and task, workload (NASATLX) were measured through subjective questionnaires. Additionally, we report saccades per minute and fixation duration. The results revealed statistically significant differences showing that Embedded and GUI interfaces, when compared to the Directional Gaze interface, can lead to lower workloads and higher performance in pick-up tasks.

Eye-gaze stands out as an intuitive interface for hands-free control of robotic devices due to its brief training time, fast calibration, low invasiveness, and reduced complexity and cost. However, current approaches are limited by available screen space, excessive wait times, frequent context switching, inconsistent gaze tracker accuracy, and the trade-off between feature-richness and usability. This article presents Diegetic Graphical User Interfaces, a novel, intuitive, and computationally inexpensive approach for gaze-controlled interfaces applied to a robotic arm for precision pick-and-place tasks. By using customizable symbols paired with fiducial markers, interactive buttons are defined and embedded into the robot, which users can trigger via gaze. Twenty-one participants completed the Yale-CMU-Berkeley (YCB) Block Pick and Place Protocol, reporting good usability and user experience, while achieving comparable workload to similar systems. The resulting system is fast to learn, does not restrain the user’s head, and mitigates context switching, while demonstrating intuitive control continuous Cartesian control of a robot arm in precision tasks.

Robot swarms are decentralised systems that use simple rules to achieve collective goals, yet their real-world deployment is limited by a lack of understanding of human trust and perception. This study examines how swarm motion affects the trust of novice users in a service-oriented swarm, using an automated cloakroom as a test case. We conducted 20 human trials, where participants interacted with a swarm exhibiting either structured (grid-like) or organic (adaptive) motion, with performance controlled across conditions. Trust and perception were assessed via self-reporting questionnaires and eye-tracking data. Results indicate that performance and reliability, rather than motion, are the key drivers of trust. However, motion influenced perceived predictability, highlighting its role in designing transparent and user-friendly swarm systems.