Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuning Jiang
dblp:328/7115
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-6706-2818ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › perception
perception in visualization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | A Rigorous Behavior Assessment of CNNs Using a Data-Domain Sampling Regime · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026 |
Visualization and visual analytics
visualization evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | What Makes a Visualization Image Complex? · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | A Rigorous Behavior Assessment of CNNs Using a Data-Domain Sampling Regime · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026 |
Human-AI interaction
human-machine comparison |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | A Rigorous Behavior Assessment of CNNs Using a Data-Domain Sampling Regime · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
data-domain sampling · 3.0CNN evaluation · 3.0information-theoretic metrics · 1.0crowdsourcing experiment · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | What Makes a Visualization Image Complex?abstractWe investigate the perceived visual complexity (VC) in data visualizations using objective image-based metrics. We collected VC scores through a large-scale crowdsourcing experiment involving 349 participants and 1,800 visualization images. We then examined how these scores align with 12 image-based metrics spanning pixel-based and statistic-information-theoretic (clutter), color, shape, and our two new object-based metrics (meaningful-color-count (MeC) and text-to-ink ratio (TiR)). Our results show that both low-level edges and high-level elements affect perceived VC in visualization images; the number of corners and distinct colors are robust metrics across visualizations. Second, feature congestion, a statistical information-theoretic metric capturing color and texture patterns, is the strongest predictor of perceived complexity in visualizations rich in the same continuous color/texture stimuli; edge density effectively explains VC in node-link diagrams. Additionally, we observe a bell-curve effect for texts: increasing TiR initially reduces complexity, reaching an optimal point, beyond which further text increases VC. Our quantification model is also interpretable-enabling metric-based explanations-grounded in the VisComplexity2K dataset, bridging computational metrics with human perceptual responses. The preregistration is available at osf.io/5xe8a. osf.io/bdet6 has the dataset and analysis code. Mengdi Chu, Zefeng Qiu, Meng Ling, Shuning Jiang, Robert S. Laramee, Michael Sedlmair, Jian Chen 0006 |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 4 |
| 2026 | A Rigorous Behavior Assessment of CNNs Using a Data-Domain Sampling RegimeabstractWe present a data-domain sampling regime for quantifying CNNs' graphic perception behaviors. This regime lets us evaluate CNNs' ratio estimation ability in bar charts from three perspectives: sensitivity to training-test distribution discrepancies, stability to limited samples, and relative expertise to human observers. After analyzing 16 million trials from 800 CNN models and 6,825 trials from 113 human participants, we arrived at a simple and actionable conclusion: CNNs can outperform humans and their biases simply depend on the training-test distance. We show evidence of this simple, elegant behavior of the machines when they interpret visualization images. osf.io/gfqc3 provides registration, the code for our sampling regime, and experimental results. Shuning Jiang, Wei-Lun Chao, Daniel Haehn, Hanspeter Pfister, Jian Chen 0006 |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |