Qiping Pan

dblp:332/0548 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation › interactive program synthesis
interactive code generation
0.612022
INTENT: Interactive Tensor Transformation Synthesis · UIST 2022
Usability and user experience research › psychology of programming
program comprehension
0.212022
INTENT: Interactive Tensor Transformation Synthesis · UIST 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

within-subjects user study · 1.1program inference · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 INTENT: Interactive Tensor Transformation Synthesis
abstract
There is a growing interest in adopting Deep Learning (DL) given its superior performance in many domains. However, modern DL frameworks such as TensorFlow often come with a steep learning curve. In this work, we propose INTENT, an interactive system that infers user intent and generates corresponding TensorFlow code on behalf of users. INTENT helps users understand and validate the semantics of generated code by rendering individual tensor transformation steps with intermediate results and element-wise data provenance. Users can further guide INTENT by marking certain TensorFlow operators as desired or undesired, or directly manipulating the generated code. A within-subjects user study with 18 participants shows that users can finish programming tasks in TensorFlow more successfully with only half the time, compared with a variant of INTENT that has no interaction or visualization support.
Zhanhui Zhou, Man To Tang, Qiping Pan, Shangyin Tan, Xinyu Wang 0006, Tianyi Zhang 0001
UIST3