Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ounjeong Roh

dblp:34/11051 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › nonverbal communication
robot gesture
0.112012
Robot gesture and user acceptance of information in human-robot interaction · HRI 2012
Human-robot interaction › service robot
museum guide robot
0.012012
Robot gesture and user acceptance of information in human-robot interaction · HRI 2012
Human-robot interaction
social robot
0.012012
Robot gesture and user acceptance of information in human-robot interaction · HRI 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wizard-of-oz · 0.1between-subject experiment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Robot gesture and user acceptance of information in human-robot interaction
abstract
This study explores how human users respond to coordinated and uncoordinated gestures of a robot as an information deliverer. A between-subject experiment was conducted using the Wizard of Oz method, with 63 participants randomly assigned to one of four conditions (voice-only vs. no-gesture vs. coordinated gesture vs. uncoordinated gesture) taking an artwork class in a museum-like setting. The robot was explaining the information of the artworks with modalities accordingly designed to each condition. Results showed that the coordinated gesture was not aiding information delivery. However, there were notable relations between the coordinated gesture and intimacy, homogeneity, and involvement. These results have theoretical implications for cognitive load of working memory and practical implications for designing and deploying dynamic humanoid robots for museum tour guide.
Aelee Kim, Hyejin Kum, Ounjeong Roh, Sangseok You, Sukhan Lee 0001
HRI3