Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ounjeong Roh
dblp:34/11051
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › nonverbal communication
robot gesture |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Robot gesture and user acceptance of information in human-robot interaction · HRI 2012 |
Human-robot interaction › service robot
museum guide robot |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Robot gesture and user acceptance of information in human-robot interaction · HRI 2012 |
Human-robot interaction
social robot |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Robot gesture and user acceptance of information in human-robot interaction · HRI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wizard-of-oz · 0.1between-subject experiment · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Robot gesture and user acceptance of information in human-robot interactionabstractThis study explores how human users respond to coordinated and uncoordinated gestures of a robot as an information deliverer. A between-subject experiment was conducted using the Wizard of Oz method, with 63 participants randomly assigned to one of four conditions (voice-only vs. no-gesture vs. coordinated gesture vs. uncoordinated gesture) taking an artwork class in a museum-like setting. The robot was explaining the information of the artworks with modalities accordingly designed to each condition. Results showed that the coordinated gesture was not aiding information delivery. However, there were notable relations between the coordinated gesture and intimacy, homogeneity, and involvement. These results have theoretical implications for cognitive load of working memory and practical implications for designing and deploying dynamic humanoid robots for museum tour guide. Aelee Kim, Hyejin Kum, Ounjeong Roh, Sangseok You, Sukhan Lee 0001 |
HRI | 3 |