Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zachary Rowe

dblp:345/1542 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2778-4362ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% Design research and methods · 23%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
participatory design
0.312026
Counter-Visual Artifacts: Negotiating Surveillance and Carceral Visuality in Public Housing through Videovoice · CHI 2026
Privacy and data protection
surveillance
0.312026
Counter-Visual Artifacts: Negotiating Surveillance and Carceral Visuality in Public Housing through Videovoice · CHI 2026
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Counter-Visual Artifacts: Negotiating Surveillance and Carceral Visuality in Public Housing through Videovoice
abstract
U.S. public housing is historically a site of racialized and carceral surveillance. Digital surveillance technologies reinforce this containment by mediating carceral visuality, the institutionalized visual and analytic lenses that shape perceptions and governance of public housing spaces and residents. This paper presents a videovoice project with a public housing community, for which residents used smartphones to capture their routines, spatial practices, and imaginaries in relation to surveillance. We analyze how these video artifacts enact alternative ways of seeing and knowing, surfacing overlooked routines, relations, and critiques of surveillance. These videos document what is often invisibilized: the lived consequences of carceral visuality and the situated knowledge of those surveilled. We propose “counter-visual artifacts” to describe the political and disruptive role these videos play in challenging dominant visual regimes and reclaiming the right to see and be seen otherwise. By advocating for counter-visual sensibilities, we invite HCI scholars to rethink how artifacts make room for alternative ways of seeing.
Alex Jiahong Lu, Mark S. Ackerman, Zachary Rowe, Tawanna Dillahunt
CHI3