Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhuoyi Cui

dblp:345/1759 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › social robot
social robot deployment
0.912025
"Would You Please Help Me?" A Study on People's Reaction to a Tactile Paving Detection Robot · HRI 2025
Collaborative and social computing › civic engagement
public participation
0.312025
"Would You Please Help Me?" A Study on People's Reaction to a Tactile Paving Detection Robot · HRI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wizard-of-oz · 0.9in-the-wild study · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 "Would You Please Help Me?" A Study on People's Reaction to a Tactile Paving Detection Robot
abstract
This paper presents AccessiBot, a tactile paving detection robot developed to address urban accessibility challenges. Beyond collecting real-time data for evidence-based governance, this study explores AccessiBot's potential to encourage citizen engagement. Using the Wizard-of-Oz methodology, we conducted an in-the-wild study to simulate real-world interactions and observe how people respond to the robot. Our observation findings show that people do help robots, and their engagement with the robot varied significantly, ranging from passive acknowledgement to active assistance. Besides, post-hoc interviews indicated that participants recognized the robot's social value.
Wenjing Deng, Zhuoyi Cui, Xintong Wu, Yijie Guo, Haipeng Mi
HRI2