Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhuoyi Cui
dblp:345/1759
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › social robot
social robot deployment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | "Would You Please Help Me?" A Study on People's Reaction to a Tactile Paving Detection Robot · HRI 2025 |
Collaborative and social computing › civic engagement
public participation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | "Would You Please Help Me?" A Study on People's Reaction to a Tactile Paving Detection Robot · HRI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wizard-of-oz · 0.9in-the-wild study · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | "Would You Please Help Me?" A Study on People's Reaction to a Tactile Paving Detection RobotabstractThis paper presents AccessiBot, a tactile paving detection robot developed to address urban accessibility challenges. Beyond collecting real-time data for evidence-based governance, this study explores AccessiBot's potential to encourage citizen engagement. Using the Wizard-of-Oz methodology, we conducted an in-the-wild study to simulate real-world interactions and observe how people respond to the robot. Our observation findings show that people do help robots, and their engagement with the robot varied significantly, ranging from passive acknowledgement to active assistance. Besides, post-hoc interviews indicated that participants recognized the robot's social value. Wenjing Deng, Zhuoyi Cui, Xintong Wu, Yijie Guo, Haipeng Mi |
HRI | 2 |