Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haein Yeo

dblp:345/1784 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-9458-0906ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation › personalization
LLM personalization
1.012026
TRIPLE: Theory-Driven Integration of Planned and Habitual Behaviors for LLM-based Personalization · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › user modeling
user behavior modeling
1.012026
TRIPLE: Theory-Driven Integration of Planned and Habitual Behaviors for LLM-based Personalization · AAAI 2026
Human-AI interaction › responsible AI
trustworthy AI
1.012026
"Can LLMs Persuade Humans with Deception?": From a Deceptive Strategy Taxonomy to a Large-Scale Empirical Study · CHI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312026
TRIPLE: Theory-Driven Integration of Planned and Habitual Behaviors for LLM-based Personalization · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 2.0think-aloud protocol · 2.0taxonomy development · 2.0theory of planned behavior · 1.0in-context learning · 1.0dual process theory · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 TRIPLE: Theory-Driven Integration of Planned and Habitual Behaviors for LLM-based Personalization
abstract
While large language model (LLM)-based user profiling offers significant potential for personalization, most existing approaches rely on empirical heuristics and lack grounding in the psychological mechanism that drive human behavior. In this paper, we introduce TRIPLE (Theory-guided Reasoning for Intent and habIt Profiling with LLMs for pErsonalization), a novel framework that systematically integrates dual-process theory from social psychology into LLM-based user modeling. TRIPLE (1) constructs a habitual behavior profile by identifying repeated patterns over time to model automatic responses; (2) builds an intentional behavior profile by inferring user attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB); and (3) generates behavioral rationale that reveal the interaction between habitual and intentional processes to predict user behavior in context-specific situations. We evaluate TRIPLE on five personalization tasks from the LaMP benchmark using multiple open-source LLMs. Results show that TRIPLE consistently outperforms existing in-context learning methods, with especially pronounced gains on complex generative tasks such as headline and title generation. Qualitative analyses further demonstrate that the profiles and reasoning paths generated by TRIPLE provide interpretable and psychologically grounded explanations of user behavior. These findings provide strong evidence that incorporating validated behavioral theories into LLM-based personalization enhances both predictive performance and interpretability, paving a way for theory-driven, socio-cognitively informed user modeling.
Taehyung Noh, Seungwan Jin, Haein Yeo, Kyungsik Han
AAAI3
2026 "Can LLMs Persuade Humans with Deception?": From a Deceptive Strategy Taxonomy to a Large-Scale Empirical Study
abstract
Beyond hallucinations, Large Language Models (LLMs) can craft deceptive arguments that erode users’ critical thinking, posing a significant yet underexamined societal risk. To address this gap, we develop a taxonomy of eight deceptive persuasion strategies by integrating top-down rhetorical theory with a bottom-up analysis of 3,360 AI-generated messages by four LLM families and examining their effects on user perceptions. Through a large-scale user study (N=602) complemented by a think-aloud protocol, we found that participants were vulnerable to Information Manipulation and Uncertainty Exploitation, especially when a message contradicted their prior beliefs. Vulnerability was significantly higher for participants with low cognitive reflection, low topic knowledge, and low topic involvement. Qualitative analyses further revealed that participants were persuaded by the plausibility of an overall narrative even when they distrusted specific details, interpreting deceptive outputs as logically framed information that broadens perspective. We discuss critical implications of these findings for the design of trustworthy AI systems, adaptive user interfaces, and targeted literacy education.
Haein Yeo, Seungwan Jin, Taehyung Noh, Yejin Shin, Sangyeon Kang, Sangwoo Heo, Hwarim Hyun, Kyungsik Han
CHI1
2025 Externalizing Social-Cognitive Structures for User Modeling: Toward Theory-Driven Profiling with LLMs
Taehyung Noh, Seungwan Jin, Haein Yeo, Kyungsik Han
CIKM3
2025 PADO: Personality-induced multi-Agents for Detecting OCEAN in human-generated texts
abstract
As personality can be useful in many cases, such as better understanding people’s underlying contexts or providing personalized services, research has long focused on modeling personality from data. However, the development of personality detection models faces challenges due to the inherent latent and relative characteristics of personality, as well as the lack of annotated datasets. To address these challenges, our research focuses on methods that effectively exploit the inherent knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs). We propose a novel approach that compares contrasting perspectives to better capture the relative nature of personality traits. In this paper, we introduce PADO (Personality-induced multi-Agent framework for Detecting OCEAN of the Big Five personality traits), the first LLM-based multi-agent personality detection framework. PADO employs personality-induced agents to analyze text from multiple perspectives, followed by a comparative judgment process to determine personality trait levels. Our experiments with various LLM models, from GPT-4o to LLaMA3-8B, demonstrate PADO’s effectiveness and generalizability, especially with smaller parameter models. This approach offers a more nuanced, context-aware method for personality detection, potentially improving personalized services and insights into digital behavior. We will release our codes.
Haein Yeo, Taehyeong Noh, Seungwan Jin, Kyungsik Han
COLING1