Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiaming Shan

dblp:351/0589 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 39% Multi-agent systems · 30% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › multi-agent planning
collaborative planning
0.812024
Constrained Human-AI Cooperation: An Inclusive Embodied Social Intelligence Challenge · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
0.812024
Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models · ICLR 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent collaboration
0.812024
Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models · ICLR 2024
Human-AI interaction
human-AI collaboration
0.812024
Constrained Human-AI Cooperation: An Inclusive Embodied Social Intelligence Challenge · NeurIPS 2024
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum architecture search
0.712023
QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark · ICML 2023
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computing
quantum circuit
0.712023
QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark · ICML 2023
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture
0.712023
QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark · ICML 2023
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing and quantum information
0.712023
QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark · ICML 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.212024
Constrained Human-AI Cooperation: An Inclusive Embodied Social Intelligence Challenge · NeurIPS 2024
Human-AI interaction
human-agent interaction
0.212024
Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 3.0planning-based baseline · 1.5modular cognitive architecture · 1.5learning-based baseline · 1.5behavior modeling · 1.5simulated annealing · 0.7reinforcement learning · 0.7genetic algorithm · 0.7differentiable algorithm · 0.7brute-force search · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models
abstract
In this work, we address challenging multi-agent cooperation problems with decentralized control, raw sensory observations, costly communication, and multi-objective tasks instantiated in various embodied environments. While previous research either presupposes a cost-free communication channel or relies on a centralized controller with shared observations, we harness the commonsense knowledge, reasoning ability, language comprehension, and text generation prowess of LLMs and seamlessly incorporate them into a cognitive-inspired modular framework that integrates with perception, memory, and execution. Thus building a Cooperative Embodied Language Agent CoELA, who can plan, communicate, and cooperate with others to accomplish long-horizon tasks efficiently. Our experiments on C-WAH and TDW-MAT demonstrate that CoELA driven by GPT-4 can surpass strong planning-based methods and exhibit emergent effective communication. Though current Open LMs like LLAMA-2 still underperform, we fine-tune a CoELA with data collected with our agents and show how they can achieve promising performance. We also conducted a user study for human-agent interaction and discovered that CoELA communicating in natural language can earn more trust and cooperate more effectively with humans. Our research underscores the potential of LLMs for future research in multi-agent cooperation. Videos can be found on the project website https://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/Co-LLM-Agents/.
Weihua Du, Jiaming Shan, Qinhong Zhou, Yilun Du, Josh Tenenbaum, Tianmin Shu, Chuang Gan 0001
ICLR3
2024 Constrained Human-AI Cooperation: An Inclusive Embodied Social Intelligence Challenge
abstract
We introduce Constrained Human-AI Cooperation (CHAIC), an inclusive embodied social intelligence challenge designed to test social perception and cooperation in embodied agents. In CHAIC, the goal is for an embodied agent equipped with egocentric observations to assist a human who may be operating under physical constraints—e.g., unable to reach high places or confined to a wheelchair—in performing common household or outdoor tasks as efficiently as possible. To achieve this, a successful helper must: (1) infer the human's intents and constraints by following the human and observing their behaviors (social perception), and (2) make a cooperative plan tailored to the human partner to solve the task as quickly as possible, working together as a team (cooperative planning). To benchmark this challenge, we create four new agents with real physical constraints and eight long-horizon tasks featuring both indoor and outdoor scenes with various constraints, emergency events, and potential risks. We benchmark planning- and learning-based baselines on the challenge and introduce a new method that leverages large language models and behavior modeling. Empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of our benchmark in enabling systematic assessment of key aspects of machine social intelligence. Our benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/UMass-Foundation-Model/CHAIC.
Weihua Du, Qiushi Lyu, Jiaming Shan, Zhenting Qi, Sunli Chen, Andi Peng, Tianmin Shu, Kwonjoon Lee, Behzad Dariush, Chuang Gan 0001
NeurIPS3
2023 QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark
abstract
Automatic quantum architecture search (QAS) has been widely studied across disciplines with different implications. In this paper, beyond a particular domain, we formulate the QAS problem into two basic (and relatively even ideal) tasks: i) arbitrary quantum circuit (QC) regeneration given a target QC; ii) approximating an arbitrary unitary (oracle). The latter can be connected to the setting of various quantum machine learning tasks and other QAS applications. Based on these two tasks, we generate a public QAS benchmark including 900 random QCs and 400 random unitary matrices which is still missing in the literature. We evaluate six baseline algorithms including brute force search, simulated annealing, genetic algorithm, reinforcement learning, hybrid algorithm, and differentiable algorithm as part of our benchmark. One characteristic of our proposed evaluation protocol on the basic tasks is that it deprives the domain-specific designs and techniques as used in existing QAS literature, making a unified evaluation possible and focusing on the vanilla search methods themselves without coupling with domain prior. In fact, the unitary approximation task could be algorithmically more difficult than the specific problems as it needs to explore the whole matrix space to fit the unitary. While specific tasks often only need to fit a partial observation of the unitary as the objective for search. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Lucky-Lance/QAS-Bench.
Kaisen Pan, Ge Yan 0001, Jiaming Shan, Junchi Yan
ICML4