Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elena Gribovskaya
dblp:36/3489
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 29% Language models and text generation · 28% Time series and sequential data · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 59% User interface design and tools · 41% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multi-hop reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › pre-trained model continual learning
continual learning for language models |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
temporal distribution shift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
temporal generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › benchmark
benchmark construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › contact control › contact task control › robot force control
adaptive impedance control |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Motion learning and adaptive impedance for robot control during physical interaction with humans · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Motion learning and adaptive impedance for robot control during physical interaction with humans · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › dual-arm manipulation
bimanual coordination |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Combining dynamical systems control and programmingby demonstration for teaching discrete bimanual coordination tasks to a humanoid robot · HRI 2008 |
User interface design and tools › end-user programming
programming by demonstration |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Combining dynamical systems control and programmingby demonstration for teaching discrete bimanual coordination tasks to a humanoid robot · HRI 2008 |
Human-robot interaction
robot learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Combining dynamical systems control and programmingby demonstration for teaching discrete bimanual coordination tasks to a humanoid robot · HRI 2008 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Motion learning and adaptive impedance for robot control during physical interaction with humans · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Motion learning and adaptive impedance for robot control during physical interaction with humans · ICRA 2011 |
Human-robot interaction
physical human-robot interaction |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Motion learning and adaptive impedance for robot control during physical interaction with humans · ICRA 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented question answering · 1.1parametric fine-tuning · 1.1streaming evaluation · 1.0Transformer-XL · 1.0probing · 0.8latent reasoning analysis · 0.8programming by demonstration · 0.4impedance tuning · 0.2adaptive control · 0.2dynamical systems · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?abstractWe study whether Large Language Models (LLMs) latently perform multi-hop reasoning with complex prompts such as "The mother of the singer of 'Superstition' is".We look for evidence of a latent reasoning pathway where an LLM (1) latently identifies "the singer of 'Superstition"' as Stevie Wonder, the bridge entity, and (2) uses its knowledge of Stevie Wonder's mother to complete the prompt.We analyze these two hops individually and consider their co-occurrence as indicative of latent multi-hop reasoning.For the first hop, we test if changing the prompt to indirectly mention the bridge entity instead of any other entity increases the LLM's internal recall of the bridge entity.For the second hop, we test if increasing this recall causes the LLM to better utilize what it knows about the bridge entity.We find strong evidence of latent multi-hop reasoning for the prompts of certain relation types, with the reasoning pathway used in more than 80% of the prompts.However, the utilization is highly contextual, varying across different types of prompts.Also, on average, the evidence for the second hop and the full multi-hop traversal is rather moderate and only substantial for the first hop.Moreover, we find a clear scaling trend with increasing model size for the first hop of reasoning but not for the second hop.Our experimental findings suggest potential challenges and opportunities for future development and applications of LLMs. Sohee Yang, Elena Gribovskaya, Nora Kassner, Mor Geva, Sebastian Riedel 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2022 | StreamingQA: A Benchmark for Adaptation to New Knowledge over Time in Question Answering ModelsabstractKnowledge and language understanding of models evaluated through question answering (QA) has been usually studied on static snapshots of knowledge, like Wikipedia. However, our world is dynamic, evolves over time, and our models’ knowledge becomes outdated. To study how semi-parametric QA models and their underlying parametric language models (LMs) adapt to evolving knowledge, we construct a new large-scale dataset, StreamingQA, with human written and generated questions asked on a given date, to be answered from 14 years of time-stamped news articles. We evaluate our models quarterly as they read new articles not seen in pre-training. We show that parametric models can be updated without full retraining, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. For semi-parametric models, adding new articles into the search space allows for rapid adaptation, however, models with an outdated underlying LM under-perform those with a retrained LM. For questions about higher-frequency named entities, parametric updates are particularly beneficial. In our dynamic world, the StreamingQA dataset enables a more realistic evaluation of QA models, and our experiments highlight several promising directions for future research. Adam Liska, Tomás Kociský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tayfun Terzi, Eren Sezener, Devang Agrawal, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tim Scholtes, Manzil Zaheer, Susannah Young, Ellen Gilsenan-McMahon, Sophia Austin, Phil Blunsom, Angeliki Lazaridou |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language ModelsabstractOur world is open-ended, non-stationary, and constantly evolving; thus what we talk about and how we talk about it change over time. This inherent dynamic nature of language contrasts with the current static language modelling paradigm, which trains and evaluates models on utterances from overlapping time periods. Despite impressive recent progress, we demonstrate that Transformer-XL language models perform worse in the realistic setup of predicting future utterances from beyond their training period, and that model performance becomes increasingly worse with time. We find that, while increasing model size alone—a key driver behind recent progress—does not solve this problem, having models that continually update their knowledge with new information can indeed mitigate this performance degradation over time. Hence, given the compilation of ever-larger language modelling datasets, combined with the growing list of language-model-based NLP applications that require up-to-date factual knowledge about the world, we argue that now is the right time to rethink the static way in which we currently train and evaluate our language models, and develop adaptive language models that can remain up-to-date with respect to our ever-changing and non-stationary world. We publicly release our dynamic, streaming language modelling benchmarks for WMT and arXiv to facilitate language model evaluation that takes temporal dynamics into account. Angeliki Lazaridou, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Elena Gribovskaya, Devang Agrawal, Adam Liska, Tayfun Terzi, Mai Gimenez, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tomás Kociský, Sebastian Ruder, Dani Yogatama, Kris Cao, Susannah Young, Phil Blunsom |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2011 | HRI pioneers workshop 2011abstractThe 2011 HRI Pioneers Workshop will be conducted in conjunction with the 2011 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). The 2011 HRI Pioneers Workshop will provide a forum for graduate students and postdocs to learn about the current state of HRI, to present their work and to network with one another and with select senior researchers in a setting that is less formal and more interactive than the main conference. Workshop participants will discuss important issues and open challenges in the field, encouraging the formation of collaborative relationships across disciplines and geographic boundaries. Thomas Kollar, Astrid Weiss, Jason Monast, Anja Austermann, David Lu, Elena Gribovskaya, Chandan Datta, Richard Kelley, Hirotaka Osawa, Lanny Lin |
HRI | 7 |
| 2011 | Motion learning and adaptive impedance for robot control during physical interaction with humansabstractThis article combines programming by demonstration and adaptive control for teaching a robot to physically interact with a human in a collaborative task requiring sharing of a load by the two partners. Learning a task model allows the robot to anticipate the partner's intentions and adapt its motion according to perceived forces. As the human represents a highly complex contact environment, direct reproduction of the learned model may lead to sub-optimal results. To compensate for unmodelled uncertainties, in addition to learning we propose an adaptive control algorithm that tunes the impedance parameters, so as to ensure accurate reproduction. To facilitate the illustration of the concepts introduced in this paper and provide a systematic evaluation, we present experimental results obtained with simulation of a dyad of two planar 2-DOF robots. Elena Gribovskaya, Abderrahmane Kheddar, Aude Billard |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2008 | Combining dynamical systems control and programmingby demonstration for teaching discrete bimanual coordination tasks to a humanoid robotabstractWe present a generic framework that combines Dynamical Systems movement control with Programming by Demon- stration (PbD) to teach a robot bimanual coordination task. The model consists of two systems: a learning system that processes data collected during the demonstration of the task to extract coordination constraints and a motor system that reproduces the movements dynamically, while satisfy- ing the coordination constraints learned by the ¯rst system. We validate the model through a series of experiments in which a robot is taught bimanual manipulatory tasks with the help of a human. Elena Gribovskaya, Aude Billard |
HRI | 1 |