Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ethan D. Montag

dblp:36/3786 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 50% Image and video processing · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging
color imaging
0.011997
Psychophysical evaluation of gamut mapping techniques using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1997
Image and video processing › color image processing
gamut mapping
0.011997
Psychophysical evaluation of gamut mapping techniques using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1997
Usability and user experience research
perceptual evaluation
0.011997
Psychophysical evaluation of gamut mapping techniques using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

paired comparison paradigm · 0.0CIELAB color space · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Evaluating tone mapping algorithms for rendering non-pictorial (scientific) high-dynamic-range images
Ethan D. Montag
J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent.2
2006 Techniques for Fusion of Multimodal Images: Application to Breast Imaging
abstract
In many situations it is desirable and advantageous to acquire medical images in more than one modality. For example positron emission tomography can be used to acquire functional data while magnetic resonance imaging can be used to acquire morphological data. In some situations a side by side comparison of the images provides enough information, but in other situations it may be considered a necessity to have the exact spatial relationship between the modalities presented to the observer. In order to accomplish this, the images need to first be registered and then combined (fused) to create a single image. In this paper we discuss the options for performing such fusion in the context of multimodal breast imaging.
Karl G. Baum, María Helguera, Joseph P. Hornak, John P. Kerekes, Ethan D. Montag, Mehmet Z. Unlu, David H. Feiglin, Andrzej Król
ICIP5
1997 Psychophysical evaluation of gamut mapping techniques using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries
abstract
Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test images consisted of simple rendered spheres floating in front of a gray background. Using CIELAB as our device-independent color space, cut-off values for lightness and chroma, based on the statistics of the images, were chosen to reduce the gamuts for the test images. The gamut mapping algorithms consisted of combinations of clipping and mapping the original gamut in linear piecewise segments. Complete color space compression in RGB and CIELAB was also tested. Each of the colored originals (R,G,B,C,M,Y, and Skin) were mapped separately in lightness and chroma. In addition, each algorithm was implemented with saturation (C(*)/L(*)) allowed to vary or retain the same values as in the original image. Pairs of test images with reduced color gamuts were presented to twenty subjects along with the original image. For each pair the subjects chose the test image that better reproduced the original. Rank orders and interval scales of algorithm performance with confidence limits were then derived. Clipping all out-of-gamut colors was the best method for mapping chroma. For lightness mapping at low lightness levels and high lightness levels particular gamut mapping algorithms consistently produced images chosen as most like the original. The choice of device-independent color space may also influence which gamut mapping algorithms are best.
Ethan D. Montag, Mark D. Fairchild
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1