Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Corker

dblp:36/6784 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 87% Usability and user experience research · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › shared control
control allocation
0.011989
Simulation-modeling tool for evaluation of space telerobotic control strategies · ICRA 1989
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.011989
Simulation-modeling tool for evaluation of space telerobotic control strategies · ICRA 1989
Usability and user experience research
human performance modeling
0.011989
Simulation-modeling tool for evaluation of space telerobotic control strategies · ICRA 1989
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Simulation-modeling tool for evaluation of space telerobotic control strategies
abstract
An object-oriented software graphic simulation and modeling tool is developed to explore human/autonomous control allocation for varied operational scenarios. The system provides designers with LISP workstations through which to simulate telerobotic operations, to model human performance in those operations, to examine task performance profiles, and to investigate control and diagnostic strategies. It is suggested that the provision of such analytic tools along with the presentation of performance projections can assist designers in rapidly and conventionally exploring design alternatives for telerobotic system control.>
Kevin Corker, Nichael Cramer
ICRA1