Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tae-Jin Song

dblp:360/2803 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 50% User interface design and tools · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › explainable AI
explainable AI interfaces
0.812024
Do stakeholder needs differ? - Designing stakeholder-tailored Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) interfaces · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2024
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.212024
Do stakeholder needs differ? - Designing stakeholder-tailored Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) interfaces · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scenario-based design · 1.5qualitative study · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Development and validation of screening items intended for a digital aphasia test in Korean-speaking stroke patients
Jungwan Kim, Seongeun Hwang, Jinseub Hwang, Tae-Jin Song, Jihye Yoon, Juhee Yi
Speech Commun.4
2024 Do stakeholder needs differ? - Designing stakeholder-tailored Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) interfaces
abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) is increasingly being used in the healthcare domain. In health management, clinicians and patients are critical stakeholders, requiring tailored XAI explanations based on their unique needs. Our study investigates the differences in explanation needs between clinicians and patients and designs corresponding explanation interfaces for each group. Using a scenario-based approach, we assessed stakeholder-tailored needs, analyzed differences, and designed interfaces using theoretical frameworks. The results demonstrate diverse stakeholder motivations for seeking explanations, leading to varied requirements. The designed interfaces effectively address these requirements, as validated by the preference selection and qualitative feedback from clinicians and patients. Their suggestions provide design insights and highlight the divergent needs of these stakeholder groups. This study contributes practical and theoretical implications to XAI research, emphasizing the importance of understanding diverse stakeholder needs and incorporating relevant theoretical concepts into user-centered interface design.
Saebyeol Kim, Tae-Jin Song, Yuyoung Kim
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.4