Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eshika Khandelwal
dblp:362/2158
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video understanding |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Shot-by-Shot: Film-Grammar-Aware Training-Free Audio Description Generation · ICCV 2025 What You See is What You Ask: Evaluating Audio Descriptions · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › video-language understanding
audio description generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shot-by-Shot: Film-Grammar-Aware Training-Free Audio Description Generation · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shot-by-Shot: Film-Grammar-Aware Training-Free Audio Description Generation · ICCV 2025 |
Accessibility and assistive technology › accessible multimedia
audio description |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What You See is What You Ask: Evaluating Audio Descriptions · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Shot-by-Shot: Film-Grammar-Aware Training-Free Audio Description Generation · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
question answering benchmark · 2.6alignment analysis · 2.6training-free generation · 1.7shot-level temporal context · 1.7film grammar devices · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | What You See is What You Ask: Evaluating Audio DescriptionsabstractAudio descriptions (ADs) narrate important visual details in movies, enabling Blind and Low Vision (BLV) users to understand narratives and appreciate visual details.Existing works in automatic AD generation mostly focus on few-second trimmed clips, and evaluate them by comparing against a single groundtruth reference AD.However, writing ADs is inherently subjective.Through alignment and analysis of two independent AD tracks for the same movies, we quantify the subjectivity in when and whether to describe, and what and how to highlight.Thus, we show that working with trimmed clips is inadequate.We propose ADQA, a QA benchmark that evaluates ADs at the level of few-minute long, coherent video segments, testing whether they would help BLV users understand the story and appreciate visual details.ADQA features visual appreciation (VA) questions about visual facts and narrative understanding (NU) questions based on the plot.Through ADQA, we show that current AD generation methods lag far behind humanauthored ADs.We conclude with several recommendations for future work and introduce a public leaderboard for benchmarking.Generate Question Generate Question Generate Answer . . . . . .Dialog: I wish that for only one day Dad couldn't tell a lie Divy Kala, Eshika Khandelwal, Makarand Tapaswi |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | Shot-by-Shot: Film-Grammar-Aware Training-Free Audio Description GenerationabstractOur objective is the automatic generation of Audio Descriptions (ADs) for edited video material, such as movies and TV series. To achieve this, we propose a two-stage framework that leverages "shots" as the fundamental units of video understanding. This includes extending temporal context to neighbouring shots and incorporating film grammar devices, such as shot scales and thread structures, to guide AD generation. Our method is compatible with both open-source and proprietary Visual-Language Models (VLMs), integrating expert knowledge from add-on modules without requiring additional training of the VLMs. We achieve state-of-the-art performance among all prior training-free approaches and even surpass fine-tuned methods on several benchmarks. To evaluate the quality of predicted ADs, we introduce a new evaluation measure -- an action score -- specifically targeted to assessing this important aspect of AD. Additionally, we propose a novel evaluation protocol that treats automatic frameworks as AD generation assistants and asks them to generate multiple candidate ADs for selection. Junyu Xie, Tengda Han, Max Bain, Arsha Nagrani, Eshika Khandelwal, Gül Varol, Weidi Xie, Andrew Zisserman |
ICCV | 5 |
| 2025 | Seeing Eye to AI: Comparing Human Gaze and Model Attention in Video MemorabilityabstractUnderstanding what makes a video memorable has important applications in advertising and education technology. Towards this goal, we investigate spatiotemporal attention mechanisms underlying video memorability. Different from previous works that fuse multiple features, we adopt a simple CNN+ Transformer architecture that enables analysis of spatio-temporal attention while matching state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance on video memorability prediction. We compare model attention against human gaze fixations collected through a small-scale eye-tracking study where humans perform the video memory task. We uncover the following insights: (i) Quantitative saliency metrics show that our model, trained only to predict a memorability score, exhibits similar spatial attention patterns to human gaze, especially for more memorable videos. (ii) The model assigns greater importance to initial frames in a video, mimicking human attention patterns. (iii) Panoptic segmentation reveals that both (model and humans) assign a greater share of attention to things and less attention to stuff as compared to their occurrence probability. Prajneya Kumar, Eshika Khandelwal, Makarand Tapaswi, Vishnu Sreekumar |
WACV | 2 |