Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carolyn Guthoff

dblp:362/6806 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5017-9801ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Privacy and data protection · 42% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 19% Usable security · 17%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 54% Usability and user experience research · 46%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › web tracking
tracking detection
0.912025
AirTag-Facilitated Stalking Protection: Evaluating Unwanted Tracking Notifications and Tracker Locating Features · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Privacy and data protection › surveillance
client-side scanning
0.812024
Mental Models, Expectations and Implications of Client-Side Scanning: An Interview Study with Experts · CHI 2024
Usable security › security tool usability
key management usability
0.712023
Perceptions of Distributed Ledger Technology Key Management - An Interview Study with Finance Professionals · SP 2023
Authentication and access control › user authentication
multi-user authentication
0.712023
Perceptions of Distributed Ledger Technology Key Management - An Interview Study with Finance Professionals · SP 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 1.7thematic analysis · 1.5semi-structured interviews · 1.5qualitative interview study · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AirTag-Facilitated Stalking Protection: Evaluating Unwanted Tracking Notifications and Tracker Locating Features
Dañiel Gerhardt, Matthias Fassl, Carolyn Guthoff, Adrian Dabrowski, Katharina Krombholz
USENIX Security Symposium3
2024 Mental Models, Expectations and Implications of Client-Side Scanning: An Interview Study with Experts
abstract
Client-Side Scanning (CSS) is discussed as a potential solution to contain the dissemination of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). A significant challenge associated with this debate is that stakeholders have different interpretations of the capabilities and frontiers of the concept and its varying implementations. In this paper, we explore stakeholders’ understandings of the technology and the expectations and potential implications in the context of CSAM by conducting and analyzing 28 semi-structured interviews with a diverse sample of experts. We identified mental models of CSS and the expected challenges. Our results show that CSS is often a preferred solution in the child sexual abuse debate due to the lack of an alternative. Our findings illustrate the importance of further interdisciplinary discussions to define and comprehend the impact of CSS usage on society, particularly vulnerable groups such as children.
Divyanshu Bhardwaj 0001, Carolyn Guthoff, Adrian Dabrowski, Sascha Fahl, Katharina Krombholz
CHI2
2023 Perceptions of Distributed Ledger Technology Key Management - An Interview Study with Finance Professionals
abstract
Key management is an integral part of using distributed ledger technology (DLT). Previous work has primarily focused on key management for single-user scenarios on Bitcoin. Over the last decade, DLT has evolved to commercial and financial sectors; for example, a new German law allows the trading of a variety of financial securities via DLT. Instead of a single-user paradigm, financial institutions follow a multi-user paradigm. Combining multi-user key management with single-user key management solutions leads to unique challenges with usability and security. We extend current research through a two-stage qualitative interview study with 13 finance professionals. We investigate how the technical reality contrasts with perceptions of key management practices in corporate financial organizations. Our interdisciplinary study shows, among other things, that DLT does not meet real-world requirements in this particular domain. Moreover, it introduces additional challenges in terms of authentication and auditing. Our findings suggest that corporate financial institutions strongly support the adoption of blockchain solutions. However, to comply with regulatory and operational requirements, they face additional usability and security challenges, e.g., authentication and access control. Better mechanisms or novel design approaches are required to cover professional environments. This includes how multiple users can access the same assets and approve joint transactions.
Carolyn Guthoff, Simon Anell, Johann Hainzinger, Adrian Dabrowski, Katharina Krombholz
SP1