Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Heilman
dblp:37/2741
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Face, body and person analysis · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities
scientometrics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Predicting a Scientific Community's Response to an Article · EMNLP 2011 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › affective computing
emotion modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction · AAAI 2005 |
Human-AI interaction
affective computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction · AAAI 2005 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Effective Feature Integration for Automated Short Answer ScoringabstractA major opportunity for NLP to have a realworld impact is in helping educators score student writing, particularly content-based writing (i.e., the task of automated short answer scoring).A major challenge in this enterprise is that scored responses to a particular question (i.e., labeled data) are valuable for modeling but limited in quantity.Additional information from the scoring guidelines for humans, such as exemplars for each score level and descriptions of key concepts, can also be used.Here, we explore methods for integrating scoring guidelines and labeled responses, and we find that stacked generalization (Wolpert, 1992) improves performance, especially for small training sets. Keisuke Sakaguchi, Michael Heilman, Nitin Madnani |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2012 | Identifying High-Level Organizational Elements in Argumentative Discourse
Nitin Madnani, Michael Heilman, Joel R. Tetreault, Martin Chodorow |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2011 | Predicting a Scientific Community's Response to an Article
Dani Yogatama, Michael Heilman, Brendan T. O'Connor 0001, Chris Dyer, Bryan R. Routledge, Noah A. Smith |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2010 | Good Question! Statistical Ranking for Question Generation
Michael Heilman, Noah A. Smith |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2010 | Tree Edit Models for Recognizing Textual Entailments, Paraphrases, and Answers to Questions
Michael Heilman, Noah A. Smith |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2008 | Automatically Generating and Validating Reading-Check Questions
Christine M. Feeney, Michael Heilman |
Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 2 |
| 2008 | Self-assessment in Vocabulary Tutoring
Michael Heilman, Maxine Eskénazi |
Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 1 |
| 2008 | Word Sense Disambiguation for Vocabulary Learning
Anagha Kulkarni 0001, Michael Heilman, Maxine Eskénazi, Jamie Callan |
Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 2 |
| 2007 | Choosing Reading Passages for Vocabulary Learning by Topic to Increase Intrinsic Motivation
Michael Heilman, Alan Juffs, Maxine Eskénazi |
AIED | 1 |
| 2007 | Combining Lexical and Grammatical Features to Improve Readability Measures for First and Second Language Texts
Michael Heilman, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Jamie Callan, Maxine Eskénazi |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2006 | Classroom success of an intelligent tutoring system for lexical practice and reading comprehensionabstractWe present an intelligent tutoring system called REAP that provides reader-specific lexical practice for improved reading comprehension. REAP offers individualized practice to students by presenting authentic and appropriate reading materials selected automatically from the web. We encountered a number of challenges that must be met in order for the system to be effective in a classroom setting. These include general challenges for a system that uses authentic materials, as well as more specific challenges that arise from integrating the system with pre-existing classroom curricula. We discuss how these challenges were met, and present evidence that REAP has gained acceptance into the classroom at the English Language Institute at the University of Pittsburgh. 1. System Description Michael Heilman, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Jamie Callan, Maxine Eskénazi |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2005 | Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction
Matthias Scheutz, James F. Kramer, Christopher Middendorff, Paul W. Schermerhorn, Michael Heilman, P. Bui |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2005 | MALT - a Multi-lingual Adaptive Language Tutor
Matthias Scheutz, Michael Heilman, Aaron Wenger, Colleen Ryan-Scheutz |
AIED | 2 |