VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shreya Tomar
dblp:374/9176
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-9268-1820ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 77% Design research and methods · 23% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wearable and physiological sensing › wearable camera
camera glasses |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer's Perspective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera Glasses · CHI 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › image privacy
bystander privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer's Perspective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera Glasses · CHI 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › image privacy
wearable camera privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer's Perspective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera Glasses · CHI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
micro-longitudinal study · 1.5exit interview · 1.5diary study · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer's Perspective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera GlassesabstractThe rising popularity of camera glasses challenges societal norms of recording bystanders and thus requires efforts to mediate privacy preferences. We present the first study on the wearers’ perspectives and explore privacy challenges associated with wearing camera glasses when bystanders are present. We conducted a micro-longitudinal diary study (N = 15) followed by exit interviews with existing users and people without prior experience. Our results show that wearers consider the currently available privacy indicators ineffective. They believe the looks and interaction design of the glasses conceal the technology from unaware people. Due to the lack of effective privacy-mediating measures, wearers feel emotionally burdened with preserving bystanders’ privacy. We furthermore elicit how this sentiment impacts their usage of camera glasses and highlight the need for technical and non-technical solutions. Finally, we compare the wearers’ and bystanders’ perspectives and discuss the design space of a future privacy-preserving ecosystem for wearable cameras. Divyanshu Bhardwaj 0001, Alexander Ponticello, Shreya Tomar, Adrian Dabrowski, Katharina Krombholz |
CHI | 3 |