Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Shreya Tomar

dblp:374/9176 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-9268-1820ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 77% Design research and methods · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing › wearable camera
camera glasses
0.812024
In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer's Perspective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera Glasses · CHI 2024
Privacy and data protection › image privacy
bystander privacy
0.812024
In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer's Perspective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera Glasses · CHI 2024
Privacy and data protection › image privacy
wearable camera privacy
0.812024
In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer's Perspective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera Glasses · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

micro-longitudinal study · 1.5exit interview · 1.5diary study · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 In Focus, Out of Privacy: The Wearer's Perspective on the Privacy Dilemma of Camera Glasses
abstract
The rising popularity of camera glasses challenges societal norms of recording bystanders and thus requires efforts to mediate privacy preferences. We present the first study on the wearers’ perspectives and explore privacy challenges associated with wearing camera glasses when bystanders are present. We conducted a micro-longitudinal diary study (N = 15) followed by exit interviews with existing users and people without prior experience. Our results show that wearers consider the currently available privacy indicators ineffective. They believe the looks and interaction design of the glasses conceal the technology from unaware people. Due to the lack of effective privacy-mediating measures, wearers feel emotionally burdened with preserving bystanders’ privacy. We furthermore elicit how this sentiment impacts their usage of camera glasses and highlight the need for technical and non-technical solutions. Finally, we compare the wearers’ and bystanders’ perspectives and discuss the design space of a future privacy-preserving ecosystem for wearable cameras.
Divyanshu Bhardwaj 0001, Alexander Ponticello, Shreya Tomar, Adrian Dabrowski, Katharina Krombholz
CHI3